Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02699339DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02699339

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02699339
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: BMG <bgordon Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 9:02 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Cc: Richard Kahn; Darren Indyke Subject: Fwd: E-7871-S Artesian Variance Attachments: Figure2.pdf; Untitled attachment 00314.htm; Figure2B.pdf; Untitled attachment 00317.htm Recommend the simpler appr=ach Plse advise Sent from my iPhone Begin fo=warded message: From: Ca=ey Cook GMT-04:00 To: brice gorthn Subject: E-7871-S Artesian Variance Brice G.; =r>Date: June 20, 2012 11:22:28 AM As we discussed, I spoke to David Anderson at OSE regarding the=artesian construction variance for well E-7871-S. Mr. Anderson has re=iewed the artesian variance request package we sent on June 4, 2012. =he package is currently under review by others in his office, and he expect= that a decision on the variance request will be returned in the next week o= two. He suggested that the annular seal and grout above the s=reen could be modified to simplify construction. Recall that during a=phone conversation with Mr. Anderson in March 2012 we discussed t=e OSE concern with potential interaquifer exchange along the borehole annul=s in the proposed well. To address the concern, we agreed to install m=ltiple annular bentonite seals above the screen. Now that he has the f=ll hydrologic picture provided in the variance request, he agrees that a si=gle bentonite seal above the screen with Quik Grout installed in the annulu= above the bentonite (and below the cement surface seal) will be adequate t= prevent any fluid exchange along the borehole. The attached figures s=ow the original plan with multiple seals (Figure 2) and the revis=d plan with a single seal (Figure 28). The change would streamline we=l construction; bentonite seals must be left undisturbed after install=tion for one to three hours to hydrate. Eliminating two seals wo=ld save up to six hours of construction/standby time. I have a call i= to Bill Whaley to find out whether the change would reduce his estimated d=illing costs. Mr. Anderson indicates that an email to him proposing th= change would be adequate for him to incorporate it into the variance reque=t. I would also send attached Figure 2B for clarity. I recommend moving ahead with a single bentonite seal as shown in=Figure 2B to streamline well construction. Please let me know if you want t= proceed this way, or call if further discussion is needed. EFTA_R1_02061554 EFTA02699339 =div> -- Casey W. Cook, P.E. Balleau Groundwater, Inc. 901 Rio Grande Blvd. NW Suite F-242 Albuquerque, NM 87104 2 EFTA_R1_02061555 EFTA02699340

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone2699339
Phone2699340

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.