Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02704309DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02704309

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02704309
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Erika Kellerhals Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 8:23 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Fwd: Great St. James Attachments: BMA SURVEY PROPOSAL Great St James 2016-02-04.pdt BUDGET 2016-02-04.pdt BMA Rates 2016.pdf FYI. PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW ADDRESS BE=OW. Erika A. Kellerhals Member Kellerhals Ferguson Kroblin PLLC Royal Palms Professional Building 9053 Estate Thomas =uite 101 St. =homas, VI 00802 Notice: This communication may co=tain privileged or other confidential information. If you are not th= intended recipient, or believe that you have received this communication =n error, please do not print, copy, re-transmit, disseminate, or otherwise=use this information. Also, please indicate to the sender that you h=ve received this e-mail in error, and delete the copy you received. =hank you. Circular 230: To ensure compliance wi=h the requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any tax advice c=ntained in our communication (including any attachments) was not intended =r written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding =ny tax penalty or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another par=y any transaction or matter addressed herein. Forwarded message F=om: Ryan Wisehart Date: Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 3:43 PM Subject: Fwd: Great St.=James EFTA_R1_02088922 EFTA02704309 To: Erika Kellerhals Cc: Richard Kahn Erika, For your convenience l'= attaching the original proposal and budget documents provided to Daphne, =hen forwarded by her to Rich. The following narrative should help fill-in =he gaps which I probably didn't communicated well via the proposal. Our Scope-of-Work as conceived includes Road Design=and Development and Topographic Surveying, as follows: 1. Devel=p conceptual road layout plan (Delivered). The purpose of this ex=rcise is to determine feasible and preferable routes for accessing the isl=nd promontories. The owner desires gentler routes than those developed on =ittle St. James. With that in mind we used existing aerial terrain mapping=to develop routes that should have gradients of about 10% or less. Routes =ere also determined that will facilitate future water and helicopter point= of access. At this point I need the owner's feedback before procee=ing to a more detailed engineering plan. Does the owner want more or f=wer roads, access to other locations, etc? We'll incorporate owner fee=back into a revised concept and proceed to developing permit plans. Prepare plans for permitting including earth-change and erosion/sedime=tation control. Upon owner approval of the conceptual road layout=plan we will develop specific plans for supporting permit applications wit= CZM. These plans will include specifications for the roadways including t=pical road section (road foundation), existing and proposed road profile e=evations (grades), erosion and sedimentation controls and best practices.<=li> 2. Field staking of roadways and erosion control measures.Q=A0Field staking of the roadways will provide accurate assessment of routes=through actual, direct ground measurement. Adjustments in road locations w=ll be made at this time to avoid terrain that is too steep, highly erodibl=, and to facilitate preservation of desirable natural features (i.e. rock =ormations, special trees, etc.) The staking will also allow investigations=by Bioimpact. 3. Topographic surveys of various areas including th= existing main house and new dock area. Basically, general on-ca=l services as requested. There was previously mention of surveying the mai= house area but I'm not aware if this is needed or not. Also, Amy ment=oned needing an as-built survey of the dock. I'm not sure if the infor=ation we presently have for the dock is sufficient for her purposes. col> Moving forward it is advisable that we have a coordination meeting=with Amy and any other persons working on the project (is there an archeol=gist on board, architect, etc.?) Also, who will be preparing the actual pe=mit application and appearing for public hearings, if any are needed? Finally, please let me know if Mr. Epstein has comment= about the road concept and if we should proceed with developing permit pl=ns. Forwarded message F=om: Ryan Wisehart <=a href= target="_blan Date: Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 11:26 AM Subje=t: Great St. James To: Daphne Wallace Cc: Erika Kell=rhals 2 EFTA_R1_02088923 EFTA02704310 Good morning Daphn=, Attached is our proposal, budget, and hourly rates. P=ease sign and return the proposal indicating acceptance and I will forward=an invoice for mobilization. Please be sure to give me a call with any que=tions. Sincerel=, Ryan C. Wisehart, PLS President BRIAN MOSELEY & ASSOCIATES, INC. 4003 Raphune Hill Road =uite #606 St. Thomas, VI 00802 ph. fx. cl. skype: r=an.c.wisehart.bma 3 EFTA_R1_02088924 EFTA02704311

Technical Artifacts (3)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone2704309
Phone2704310
Phone2704311

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.