Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02716654DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02716654

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02716654
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com> Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 1:47 PM To: jeevacation@gmail.com Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for=the recipient domain ellmax.com by ellmax.com.s9bl.psmtp.com. [74.125.148.=31. The error that the other server returned was: 571 Virus detected - psmtp Original message DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:fro=:to :content-type; bh=2olomc0lDhwAnZGz2M7N/TDg2NYDcuqWHb2T0yLISng=; b=lwqapaSeSahlt9/vNjKM58acnPBHEnjzo8qHnFvEzM6qvlz10A6c+D5JOY919+6=JS YMbLAMioy2U1FW0fTY1sxYyFdDI8/5jGKA8GWuVAnPMhm6ByTaabH3/JcinWy7XPwtM=G JcJdq3PGS95aoUjIQF85SNBAlilhEcbv4fdys8d4XajHXw4fw9h4r+7FdFzy.IFx0Xz=y OvMep20BYh6In6z/UGQ8i9trHsATPLBKF9bFAcoylE9PErERYg9ahWmECeBYyoxs2r=4 /dEDs1Czce1cZoBCzLDzXmDWuvog7AXEwpa9Jk0tV/zcCp2aDBT/Ds30Y2uHwDxqlg=w l6eQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.83.42 with SMTP id n10mr6579175wiy.54.1421416022861; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 05:47:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.47.1 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 05:47:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1810FF1F-6072-4A73-88C8-5C631C990C51@ellmax.com> References: <CA+t=u-Y0hvE5mBhM-RaG=P-1t2VhEc0Hw0CN0ojbDx1b0o8Kbw@mail.g=ail.com> <1810FF1F-6072-4A73-88C8-5C631C990C51@ellmax.com> Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 09:47:02 -0400 Message-ID: <CA+t=u-aB281vkolDcs-N2mnhHoFvL_Nn4Q+-X9H9qGpbuu658w@mail.gma=l.com> Subject: Re: joint defense agreement From: "Jeffrey E." <jeevacation@gmail.com> To: G Maxwell < Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d044283b81eec19050cc535e= Don't know in formation On Friday, January 16, 2015, G Maxwell wrote: > This from you and EFTA_R1_02156801 EFTA02716654 > My job was to manage contruction of the houses and manage households > What photos does she have? > Do not attachk jane doe's makes you look bad This puts from > and center fo the storm..can she be subpoenad or quesitoned..is this > as she remembers it..has to be much more careful.. Bu= this would help > me a lot > THE TERRAMAR PROJECT <http://theterramarproject.org/> FACEBOOK > <https://www.facebook.com/TerraMarProject> > TWITTER <http://twitter.com/terramarproject> > G+ <https://plus.google.com/104195649525707945586/posts> > PINTEREST <http://pinterest.com/terramarproject/> > INSTAGRAM <http://instagram.com/theterramarproject> > PLEDGE <http://www.theterramarproject.org/pledge> > THE DAILY CATCH <http://theterramarproject.org/thedailycatch/> > From: J leo > Date: Friday, January 16, 2015 at 4:21 AM > To: gmax > Subject: joint defense agreement > Out of respect and love for my former girlfrend I have tried to keep > her out of my mess. she was never questioned , or subpeonaed. her na=e > never surfaced. Marie never contacted her. I though it right as a > friend to protect her name. however during the entire time sh= > was my serious girlfriend. She traveled with me almost everywhere. eac= > house, she is on the plane many many times. she knew and remembers She never saw anything that claims. She can > confirm 1, Ghislaine new nothing of personal issues. her job was > to during that time ghislaine was hardly there.//// she > saw andrew at the house. 1. I was never alone at any house. > staff, friends etc. , no girl ever complained , not once. 2. jane > doe = and 2, were local strippers, that would call all the time > asking if they could do massages. . . they left message after > message. 3. We had a Message truncated <?xml version=.0" encoding=TF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd"> <plist version=.0"> <dict> <key>date-last-viewed</key> <integer>0</integer> <key>date-received</key> <integer>1421416025</integer> <key>flags</key> <integer>8590195713</integer> <key>gmail-label-ids</key> <array> <integer>7</integer> 2 EFTA_R1_02156802 EFTA02716655 <integer>27</integer> </array> <key>remote-id</key> <string>473708</string> </dict> </plist> 3 EFTA_R1_02156803 EFTA02716656

Technical Artifacts (26)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainellmax.com.s9bl.psmtp.com
Email1810ff1f-6072-4a73-88c8-5c631c990c51@ellmax.com
Emailjeevacation@gmail.com
Emailmailer-daemon@googlemail.com
Emailu-ab281vkoldcs-n2mnhhofvl_nn4q+-x9h9qgpbuu658w@mail.gma
IPv410.180.83.42
IPv410.194.47.1
Phone16022861
Phone2156801
Phone2156802
Phone2156803
Phone2716654
Phone2716655
Phone2716656
Phone5707945586
URLhttp://instagram.com/theterramarproject
URLhttp://pinterest.com/terramarproject
URLhttp://theterramarproject.org
URLhttp://theterramarproject.org/thedailycatch
URLhttp://twitter.com/terramarproject
URLhttp://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd
URLhttp://www.theterramarproject.org/pledge
URLhttps://plus.google.com/104195649525707945586/posts
URLhttps://www.facebook.com/TerraMarProject
Wire RefReferences
Wire Refreferences

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedJun 16, 2023

Deutsche Bank Epstein victim questionnaire

EXHIBIT A-1 Case 1:22-cv-10018-JSR Document 90-2 Filed 06/16/23 Page 1 of 12 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case No. 1:22-CV-10018 (JSR) NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION TO: ALL VICTIMS OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN’S SEX TRAFFICKING VENTURE DURING THE TIME PERIOD AUGUST 19, 2013 TO AUGUST 10, 2019 (THE “CLASS PERIOD”). IN ORDER TO QUALIFY FOR A SETTLEMENT PAYMENT, YOU (OR CLASS COUNSEL ON YOUR BEHALF) MUST TIMELY SUBMIT A TIER ONE FORM BY ___________, 20

12p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 013-80736-Civ-Marra/Nlatthewman JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. DECLARATION OF IN SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. I also am admitted to practice in all courts of the states of Minnesota and Florida, the Eighth, Eleventh, and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of Florida, the District of Minnesota, and the Northern District of California. My bar admission status in California and Minnesota is currently inactive. I am currently employed as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida and was so employed during all of the events described herein. 2. I am the Assistant United States Attorne

5p
Court UnsealedMar 17, 2016

Usg-Lavabit-Unsealed

U.S. District Court Eastern District of Virginia - (Alexandria) CRIMINAL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:13-sw-00522-CMH-1 Case title: USA v. In Re: Information Associated Date Filed: 07/16/2013 Date Terminated: 03/24/2015 with [Redacted] Assigned to: District Judge Claude M. Hilton Appeals court case number: 13-4625 Defendant (1) In Re: Information Associated with [Redacted] TERMINATED: 03/24/2015 Pending Counts Disposition None Highest Offense Level (Opening) None Terminated Counts Disposition None

560p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372172011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 1. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00016005

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.