Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00014150DOJ Data Set 8Correspondence

EFTA00014150

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 8
Reference
efta-efta00014150
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: "RBlack Bcc: Subject: Re: Epstein Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 23:25:48 +0000 Importance: Normal Thank you for taking the time to meet with us yesterday. ---- Original Message From: Roy BLACK To: JLeflcovi Cc: Sent: Fri Dec 05 18:22:16 2008 Subject: Re: Epstein Thanks for the notice= -----Original Message-- CILeflcor From To: To: Ro BLACK Cc Sent: 12/5/2008 6:17:23 PM Subject: Epstein Dear Roy and Jay: This afternoon Brad Edwards filed the Non-Prosecution Agreement with the Court in the Jane Does v USA case. He filed it under seal and then asked the Court to unseal it. I will fax his papers to you on Monday. PROT0

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014060

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00027776

0p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01325051

20p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01325031

20p
Court UnsealedNov 8, 2019

Alan Dershowitz Extended Rebuttal to [REDACTED - Survivor] Allegations

Case 1:19-cv-03377-LAP Document 90 Filed 11/07/19 Page 1 of 37 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 19-cv-03377-LAP v. ALAN DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. ANSWER WITH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND COUNTERCLAIMS Defendant Alan Dershowitz (“Dershowitz”) hereby answers the Complaint of Plaintiff [REDACTED - Survivor] (“Giuffre”) and asserts Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims as follows: ANSWER NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This paragrap

274p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Bcc: "Acosta, Alex (USAFLS)"

From To Cc: Bcc: "Acosta, Alex (USAFLS)" Roy BLACK' Subject: Reply Brief in Jane Does I United States Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 20:23:13 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: DE30_081016_Reply_re_Motn_Unseal.pdf; DE30-2_081016_Ex_tpdf; DE30- 3_081016_Ex_2.pdf Dear Roy and Jay: I am attaching the reply brief filed by Brad Edwards with two pieces of correspondence that he attached to his pleading as exhibits. I had not seen Mr. Edwards' October 15th letter before he filed it in connection with his Reply, so I do not know whether Mr. Lee has even received it yet. Mr. Edwards argues that Mr. Epstein has no interest in keeping the agreement confidential because he has not responded to Mr. Edwards' motion to unseal. As you know, in our Response, the United States argued that this issue should be litigated in one of the suits filed by Mr. Edwards against Mr. Epstein. Mr. Edwards apparently believes it is to his benefit to argue these issues, instead, in his lawsuit against the Un

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.