Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00014889DOJ Data Set 8Correspondence

EFTA00014889

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 8
Reference
efta-efta00014889
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The SiAdol Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 November 27, 2021 REOUEST TO BE FILED UNDER SEAL BY EMAIL The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter in response to the Court's directive at the November 23, 2021 final pretrial conference that the Government provide its anticipated order of witnesses for the upcoming trial in the above-referenced matter.' Consistent with the Court's instruction, below is the order of witnesses that the Government currently expects to call during the first two to three days of trial: 2. 3. 4. testifying under the pseudonym "Jane") (testifying under the pseudonym "O") The Government has also attempted to approximate the order in which its remaining witnesses will testify at trial. The Government notes, however, that this order may change, ' The Government respectfully requests that this letter be filed under seal. Because this letter does not seek any relief or require any ruling by the Court, it is arguably not a judicial document subject to the common law presumption of access. Moreover, this letter contains the identities of witnesses, including witnesses whom the Court has authorized to testify using pseudonyms or their first names. EFTA00014889 Page 2 depending on, among other factors, the pace of trial. Many of the below-listed witnesses will be traveling from out of state, and many witnesses have personal and/or professional obligations around which the Government is attempting to schedule. Accordingly, it is possible that the Government may call some of these witnesses in a different order than that indicated below. Additionally, the Government reserves the right to call additional witnesses should unexpected developments arise during trial. With those understandings, the Government currently expects to call its remaining witnesses in the following order: 6. 7. 8. 9. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 under the pseudonym "=") ther (testifying under the pseudonym '="2) ying only under his first name, "a) Eying only under her first name, "a) tifying only under her first name, "a") Eying under her full name, ' 2 The Government previously indicated that this witness would testify under the pseudonym "John." Because defense counsel expressed concerns about confusion that could arise from that name, the Government has changed this pseudonym to "= EFTA00014890 Page 3 31 Finally, the Government notes that it may elect not to call some of the above-listed witnesses as trial progresses. The Government will promptly inform the Court and defense counsel if it determines that any witness will not be called in the Government's case-in-chief. Respectfully submitted, DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney By: s/ Assistant United States Attorneys Southern District of New York Cc: Defense Counsel (by email) EFTA00014891

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Wire Refreferenced

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedTestimonyUnknown

Court Transcript: 777

The transcript records a court session where the judge addresses jury requests for transcripts of certain witnesses and clarification on the deliberation schedule over the New Year's holiday period. The judge discusses the schedule with counsel and decides to instruct the jury to continue deliberations as needed, including on December 31 and January 1, unless they have unmoveable commitments.

26p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 549

The government files a letter with the court regarding the anticipated testimony of law enforcement agents and the boundaries of cross-examination, citing prior court rulings and relevant case law. The government objects to certain lines of questioning by the defense, including those related to investigative techniques and motives. The letter is submitted in advance of the agents' testimony.

2p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00010037

0p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 650

The United States Attorney's office requests that the court exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act from April 1, 2022, to April 22, 2022, due to pending post-trial motions in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense counsel consents to this request. The court had previously excluded time through April 1, 2022, to allow the parties to research and brief post-trial motions.

2p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Order: 637

The court order compels a witness to testify at a hearing in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, despite their invocation of the Fifth Amendment, and grants them immunity from prosecution for their testimony. The order was approved by the Department of Justice and signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan. The witness's testimony is deemed necessary to the public interest.

2p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 372

The document is a letter from the United States Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the jury selection process in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The government requests clarification on when the parties will be provided with the names of prospective jurors and suggests that peremptory challenges be exercised at the conclusion of voir dire. The government argues that providing juror names weeks in advance is not necessary and could be unusual.

3p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.