Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00017803DOJ Data Set 8Correspondence

EFTA00017803

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 8
Reference
efta-efta00017803
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: " To: ' ,SYS)" < C c: 1 II I II (USANYS)" (USANYS)" Subject: FW: New document: v. Maxwell (Doc# -, 2d Cir. Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 03:36:28 +0000 Attachments: 2020-08-20 J-000LBRIEF,_on_behalf of Appellant_Ghislaine_Maxwell,FILED..pdf Inline-Images: image001.jpg FYI. In this brief, Maxwell's attorneys state that if Judge Nathan denies their motion to modify the protective order, they will appeal to the Second Circuit and seek consolidation of that appeal with the appeal from Judge Preska's order. From: Sigrid McCawley Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2020 8:27 PM To: `: "; 1S , Subject: FW: New document v. Maxwell (Doc* -, 2d Cir. 20-02413) Please see attached. Best, Sigrid Sigrid McCawley Partner BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP (t) www.bsfllp.com From: ECFdocuments@pacerpro.com [mailto:ECFdocuments@pacerpro.com] Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2020 8:07 PM To: Sigrid McCawley <1 ); Deborah Knowlton Subject: New document v. Maxwell (Doctl -, 2d Cir. ca; CAUTION: External email. Please do not respond to or click on links/attachments unless you recognize the sender. v. Maxwell Docket entry number: BRIEF, on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell, FILED. Service date 08/20/2020 by CM/ECF, US mail.[2913550] [20-2413] EFTA00017803 Date entered: 2020-08-20 hups::apj 13420037 Sent from PacerPro, the fastest and most insightful way to access federal court records. Questions? nia pacerpro.com or 14 15 890-4958 The information contained in this electronic message is confidential information intended only for the use of the named recipients) and may contain information that. among other protections, is the subject of attorney-client privilege, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. lithe reader of this electronic message is not the named recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the named recipient. you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and no privilege is waived. If you have received this communication in error. please immediately notify the sender by replying to this electronic message and then deleting this electronic message from your ccrnputer. tv.1 08201831859 EFTA00017804

Technical Artifacts (5)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainwww.bsfllp.com
Emailecfdocuments@pacerpro.com
Phone13420037
Phone2913550
Phone890-4958

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 914 Filed 05/11/17 Page 1 of 1

1p
Court UnsealedDepositionNov 23, 2020

John Alessi deposition

Sigrid S. McCawley Telephone: (954) 356-0011 Email: smccawley@bsfllp.com November 20, 2020 VIA ECF The Honorable Loretta A. Preska District Court Judge United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 15-cv-7433-LAP Dear Judge Preska, Pursuant to the Court’s order dated November 20, 2020 (ECF No. 1157), and in light of Does 1 and 2 not submitting any objection to unsealing within 14 days of being served with their

17p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00027158

0p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

This court order authorizes attorneys Sigrid McCawley and David Boies to bring personal electronic d...

This court order authorizes attorneys Sigrid McCawley and David Boies to bring personal electronic devices and general purpose computing devices into the courthouse for use in the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The order specifies the devices allowed and courtrooms where they can be used. The attorneys are required to comply with the restrictions and obligations set forth in Standing Order M10-468, as Revised.

1p
Court UnsealedAug 9, 2019

Maxwell Disputes

Case 18-2868, Document 284, 08/09/2019, 2628244, Page1 of 38 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------X Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. -------------------------------------------------- ............................................. VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, 15-cv-07433-RWS Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiff’s Statement of Contested Facts and Plaintiff’s “Undisputed Facts” Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 56.1 Laura A. M

38p
Court UnsealedDepositionUnknown

Deposition Transcript: 533-2

The document is a deposition transcript of G Maxwell, where she is questioned about her involvement with Jeffrey Epstein, including her role in managing contact information and her knowledge of a specific document (Exhibit 13) allegedly stolen from Epstein's house.

18p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.