Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00017995DOJ Data Set 8Correspondence

EFTA00017995

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 8
Reference
efta-efta00017995
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
HADDON MORGAN FOREMAN March 8, 2021 VIA EMAIL United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Discovery request pertaining to FOIA productions Dear Counsel: I write to request certain discovery pursuant to Fed. R. Cr. P. 16. Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, e c Laura A. Menninger Denver Colorado 80203 www.hmflow.com Under Rule 16(a)(1)(E), I ask that you provide to us the documents produced by the FBI to news media, as described in Radar Online v. FBI, 17 Civ. 3956 (PGG). The FBI in New York released to Radar Online some 1,232 pages "relating to the FBI's investigation and prosecution of Jeffrey Edward Epstein." Id. at Dkt. 25, p. 1. According to a letter signed by your office, 181 pages were released in full and 1,051 were released with partial redactions. Id. at 2. Your office made these representations and therefore presumably is aware of the documents' existence and constructively aware that their contents relate to the FBI investigation and prosecution of Jeffrey Edward Epstein and relate to the investigation and prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell. We perceive no legal basis for you to refuse to produce the records; the records have previously been released to a news media outlet, "relate to" the investigation and prosecution of Ms. Maxwell's alleged co-conspirator, and are in the government's "possession, custody, or control." We also request that your office detail when each batch of documents, by Bates number or some other identifier, were released to Radar Online. The public availability of, for example, witness statements and other investigative materials is relevant to this case because we believe there have been efforts by certain witnesses to conform their testimony to the public statements and police reports made by other witnesses. It is relevant and material to Ms. Maxwell's defense to know when the FBI made any such witness statements (even if redacted) or other materials available to a tabloid news organization. EFTA00017995 March 8, 2021 Page 2 Further, we request that you make inquiry of your "Prosecution Team," to include the USAO- SDNY, FBI-New York Office, and FBI Florida Office, regarding any other FOIA requests that have produced documents pertaining to any investigation of Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell and produce to us the documents made public through the FOIA requests, the dates the documents were produced and the identity of the recipient of the documents. Finally, in your letter to Judge Nathan of October 7, 2020, you represented that your "Prosecution Team ... had no involvement in the Florida Investigation." (Dkt. 63 at 4.) You defined your "Prosecution Team" to include not only of the USAO-SDNY but also the FBI- New York Office. We believe that the FBI-New York Office participated in the USAO-SDFL investigation by, inter alia, arranging for interviews and testimony of certain New York witnesses between 2005 and 2010. We urge you to look again at your files to ascertain whether your statement to Judge Nathan was accurate and to produce any materials that reflect the involvement of the FBI-New York Office in the USAO-SDFL investigation. Given that we are rapidly approaching trial, I ask that you please provide these materials by the end of the week, March 15, 2021. Respectfully submitted. Q Laura A. Menninger CC: Counsel of Record via Email EFTA00017996

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainwww.hmflow.com

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Ca_4ate.24h24/43134.01FrietibtOrtlefifitin0a0le28013,8111$2eafiabef146f 22

Ca_4ate.24h24/43134.01FrietibtOrtlefifitin0a0le28013,8111$2eafiabef146f 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. X 15-cv-07433-LAP Ms. Maxwell's Reply In Support Of Iler Objections to tnsealinu Sealed Materials Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Ty Gee HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue EFTA00074964 Ca_QatIgt24743tictoWneDbtOrfiefiVIMOXIle?BOWERKVaffizte12401 22 Introduction This Court asked the parties to brief three issues: "(a) the weight of presumption of public access that should be afforded to an item, (b) the identification and weight of any countervailing interests supporting continued sealing/redaction of the item, and (c) whether the countervailing interests rebut the presumption of public access to the item." DE 1044 at 1. Plaintiff and the Miami Herald's responses improperly afford the highest level of presumption to discovery dispute documents, deny that any co

40p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL'S THIRD MOTION FOR RELEASE ON BAIL Bobbi C. Sternheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00090990 INTRODUCTION Ghislaine Maxwell respectfully submits this Memorandum in Support of her Third Motion for Release on Bail. As Ms. Maxwell has stated on numerous occasions and reaffirms here: she has no intention or desire to leave this country. She is an American citizen, has lived in United States for 30 years, has strong family ties and the support of friends and family residing in this country. She wants nothing more than to remain in the United States under whatever conditions the Court deems necessary so that she can effectively prepare fo

9p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00011452

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014671

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00029590

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF HER RENEWED MOTION FOR BAIL Mark S. Cohen Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP New York, NY 10022 Phone: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. Denver, CO 80203 Phone: Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim New York, NY 10011 Phone: Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00094289 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 ARGUMENT 7 I. Reconsideration of the Court's Bail Decision is Appropriate Under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(O 7 II. Ms. Maxwell Should Be Granted Bail Under the Proposed Strict Bail Conditions 10 A. Ms. Maxwell Has Deep Family Ties to the United States and Numerous Sureties to Support Her Bond 10 1. Ms. Maxwell is Devoted to Her Spouse and Stepchildren and Would Never Destroy Her Family By Leaving th

45p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.