Case File
efta-efta00025037DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceEFTA00025037
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 8
Reference
efta-efta00025037
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Christian Everdell <
To:
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Draft joint proposed request to charge
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 22:58:41 +0000
Attachments: 2021.10.25_Letter_to_Judge_Nathan_re
Extension_of Time.DOCX
Attached is the letter we intend to file with the Court regarding the extension to file the jury charge. It should reflect
everything we discussed on our call earlier today.
Please let me know if you have any issues with it as soon as you can. I'd like to file it in the next hour or so.
Thanks,
Chris
From:
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 2:29 PM
To: Christian Everdell <
>; BOBBI C STERNHEIM <
; Jeff Pagliuca
Cc
Subject: RE: Draft joint proposed request to charge
Hi Chris,
That works. I'm around this afternoon — give me a call at
Thanks,
Laura Menninger
whenever you have a minute.
From: Christian Everdell
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 1:56 PM
To:
BOBBI C STERNHEIM
>; Laura Menninger
Cc:
Subject: (EXTERNAL] RE: Draft joint proposed request to charge
>; Jeff Pagliuca
I think I have a way to come to an agreement on this. I know today is extremely busy for all of us, but can you and I have a
5 min. call to discuss? I don't think everyone from SDNY needs to be on this call, but I leave that to you.
Thanks,
Chris
EFTA00025037
From:
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2021 3:10 PM
To: Christian Everdell
Laura Menninger
; BOBBI C STERNHEIM
;Jeff Pagliuca
Cc:
Subject: RE: Draft joint proposed request to charge
Hi Chris,
I think the answer is yes, but just to make sure: we'd file the Government's proposal on Wednesday, you'd file whatever
redline you like on November 3. It also occurs to us that, since your redline will presumably contain new
proposals/objections to ours and would not include our views, we'd want to file a short reply on November 5 or 8.
We'd consent to that option and, if you like, would join your motion for that schedule.
Thanks,
From: Christian Everdell c
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2021 12:35 PM
To:
.
=:>; BOBBI C STERNHEIM
>.; Laura Menninger
Cc:
) <I
>;
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Draft joint proposed request to charge
(USANYS)
>; Jeff Pagliuca
I just want to clarify the redline option. If we did the redline option, would you file the government's RTC (without
defense comment) on Oct. 27 and then we would file the joint RTC (i.e., our redline of your RTCs) on Nov. 3? And you
would consent to that option?
Thanks,
Chris
From:
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2021 2:30 PM
To: Christian Everdell
Cc:
Subject: RE: Draft joint proposed request to charge
Laura Menninger
; BOBBI C STERNHEIM .c=
; Jeff Pagliuca
Hi Chris,
We had another idea that might facilitate things. We know Judge Nathan asked for a joint RTC, but what about asking
Judge Nathan to let us file separate ones? We would also be comfortable setting a deadline for the defense RTC (or a
defense redline of ours) on November 3.
If you were to make a request to file separate RTCs, with your deadline on November 3, we would join that request.
Thanks,
EFTA00025038
From: Christian Everdell <
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2021 4:07 PM
To:
>; BOBBI C STERNHEIM
>; Laura Menninger
Cc
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Draft joint proposed request to charge
• Jeff Pagliuca
Given all of the other things we have going on this week, the defense would like a little more time to submit the joint
requests to charge. We plan to ask the Court for an extension until Monday, Nov. 1. Does the government consent to that
request?
Thanks,
Chris
From:
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2021 12:30 PM
To: Christian Everdell
Cc
Subject: Draft joint proposed request to charge
>; Laura Menninger
; BOBBI C STERNHEIM <
>: Jeff Pagliuca
Counsel,
Attached please find a draft joint proposed request to charge. Since this is due to the Court on Wednesday, October 27,
please send us your comments by Sunday, October 24. Please also send us your comments, including any additional
proposed jury instructions, as a redline to this document.
Thanks,
Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
EFTA00025039
Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA00025218
0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA00019897
0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA00015185
0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA00029287
0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown
EFTA00025174
0p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown
Court Filing: 133
Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team files a motion to suppress evidence obtained from a government subpoena and to dismiss Counts Five and Six of the indictment, citing the Due Process Clause. The motion is supported by a memorandum of law and exhibits. The defense attorneys representing Maxwell are listed, along with their contact information.
2p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.