EFTA00026565

From: (USANYS)" To: ' llIEWNYS)" Subject: RE: MCC discovery/notes Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 15:10:22 +0000 (USANYS)" Agreed From: (USANYS) Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 11:10 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: MCC discovery/notes I think that because it discusses suicidality, it's tangentially related to the case and we should produce it, but I don't think there's any basis to get and produce the other Epstein files. Do you guys have a different view? From: (USANYS) Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 9:57 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: MCC discovery/notes I think we haven't produced it previously, as removed everything that we had already produced. While I don't see a harm in producing this 302, I wonder if it opens us up to having to produce more of the Epstein case file or whether we can rationally limit it since it discusses suicidality. Thoughts? From: (USANYS) Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2020 9:56 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) < > Subject: RE: MCC discovery/notes I've never seen those notes before and it's not my handwriting — they came from MCC? Maybe they are Lt. ? I would check with on that to make sure it's not her handwriting. I remember seeing this 302, but I don't remember where — I don't have a memory of producing it, but I could be wrong. =should be able to tell if we produced it previously). M I and I never had access to the Epstein shared and never got or produced the underlying case files. From: (USANYS) Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 9:51 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS)< > Subject: MCC discovery/notes In reviewing additional documents for the latest MCC discovery production, I found these notes of an interview labeled "Unknown?' Any idea who this might be? Also, FBI provided us with a supplemental 302 about Epstein's arrest. Do you know if we produced the original 302 about Epstein's arrest? Thanks I Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York EFTA00026565