Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00026692DOJ Data Set 8Correspondence

EFTA00026692

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 8
Reference
efta-efta00026692
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: ' To: a' c:SEMIIIM > Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Re: Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509 Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2021 23:04:15 +0000 From: BOBBI C STERNHEIM < Sent: Sunday, October 10, 20217:03 PM To: (BOP) < Cc: (BOP) < >; Christian Everdell < (USANYS) Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509 >; Good evening- You failed to provide any update concerning the whereabouts of Ms. Maxwell's legal mail that I had placed in the legal mailbox on 10/2. However, on Friday afternoon, I was informed by Ms. Maxwell and Unit Manager that the envelope had been located and affixed to it was a bar-code type sticker, not generated by the MDC, but of the type issued by the U.S. Post Office. I had placed the envelope in the legal mailbox. It did not have postage. If, for some questionable reason, it had been handled by the U.S . Postal Service (which is highly unlikely and, if so, deliberately caused by the MDC), the Post Office would have returned it to my office address (at the return address on the envelope), not deliver it to the MDC without postage. This suggests some type of foul play on the part of the MDC, or at least some type of cover-up. I am informed that the Warden is aware of this. Today, I received the envelope from Unit Manager Today, Christian Everdell, Esq. and I had a scheduled legal visit with Ms. Maxwell. Rather than permitting us to use a somewhat larger room, we were required to use a room for two. This completely defeated the purpose of COVID protective measures. The plastic partition did not shield Mr. Everdell and there was little or no table surface for him to use. The room was unnecessarily cramped when a larger room was available. My request to use a larger room was denied. The officer claimed the team could not position the camera to focus on the larger room. This response was bogus. I requested to see the Warden, but that request was never honored. Further, defense counsel at large have heard about the current electricity issues affecting water, toilet flushing, and meals. Ms. Maxwell received a bologna sandwich despite being on no-flesh (vegetarian) diet. This is yet another blunder on the part of the MDC which needs to be immediately corrected. I will not waste my energy requesting a response because even if forthcoming it will likely be insufficient. These matters will be brought to the Court's attention, so you can start preparing excuses for consideration by Judge Nathan. Enjoy your holiday. Bobbi BOBBI C. STERNHEIM, ESQ. Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim EFTA00026692 Main: Cell: Fax: This message and any attached documents contain information from the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim that may be confidential and/or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not read, copy, distribute, or use this information. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message. Thank you. On Oct 7, 2021, at 7:45 AM, BOBBI C STERNHEIM c > wrote: Good morning- If by 9:30 this morning (10/7) Ms. Maxwell does not receive the legal mail deposited in the MDC legal mailbox on Saturday (10/2), an order to show cause will be filed with the Court. I urge you to respond and comply immediately. Bobbi BOBBI C. STERNHEIM, ESQ. Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim Main: Cell: Fax: This message and any attached documents contain information from the Low Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim that may be confidential and/or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not read, copy, distribute, or use this information. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message. Thank you. On Oct 6, 2021, at 7:00 PM, BOBBI C STERNHEIM c wrote: Good afternoon- Ms. Maxwell still has not received the legal mail (a properly addressed manila envelope) that I deposited in the East Building legal mailbox on Saturday 10/2 shortly after 3 pm while I was escorted to the lobby by a male guard. Please contact me immediately. Thank you- Bobbi EFTA00026693 Please note my new office address and preferred email address: BOBBI C. STERNHEIM, ESQ. Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim Main: Cell: Fax: This message and any attached documents contain information from the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim that may be confidential and/or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not read, copy, distribute, or use this information. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message. Thank you. On Oct 6, 2021, at 4:53 AM, I will follow up with the appropriate departments. wrote: BOBBI C STERNHEIM 10/5/2021 7:12 PM >>> Good evening- As of this writing, Ms. Maxwell has not received legal mail which I personally placed in the East Building legal mailbox on Saturday, October 2. On that same day, in that same mailbox, I deposited legal mail for a client housed in the west building. That client confirmed that he received his legal mail. Ms. Maxwell has not. Please explain why delivery of Ms. Maxwell's mail has been delayed. Time is of the essence. Her trial begins on November 29th. Every delay caused by the MDC interferes with her ability to prepare for trial. Your prompt response is requested. Thank you- Bobbi BOBBI C. STERNHEIM, ESQ. Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim EFTA00026694 Main: Cell: Fax: This message and any attached documents contain information from the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim that may be confidential and/or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not read, copy, distribute, or use this information. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message. Thank you. EFTA00026695

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00025282

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00025278

0p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

This is a reply memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys in support of her renewed motion f...

This is a reply memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys in support of her renewed motion for bail in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The document is part of the criminal case proceedings against Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The memorandum is submitted by her legal team, including attorneys from Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.

1p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00019897

0p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

Defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim writes to Judge Alison J. Nathan, criticizing the government's r...

Defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim writes to Judge Alison J. Nathan, criticizing the government's response to delayed delivery of Ghislaine Maxwell's legal mail and arguing that the situation is untenable and violates Maxwell's constitutional rights. Sternheim requests the court to reconsider Maxwell's detention.

1p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 407

The document is a court filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel requesting the release of potential jurors' names to attorneys, citing concerns about the ability to conduct background research and ensure a fair trial. The filing references relevant case law and bar association opinions to support the request.

5p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.