Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00027753DOJ Data Set 8Correspondence

EFTA00027753

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 8
Reference
efta-efta00027753
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 350 Filed 10/15/21 Page 1 of 3 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York BY ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 the Silvio J. Mono Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 October 15, 2021 USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC 0: DATE FILED: 1 On 5/21 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter in response to the Court's Order dated October 15, 2021 (Dkt. No. 348) ordering the Government to respond to the defendant's October 14, 2021 letter regarding delivery of the defendant's legal mail at the Metropolitan Detention Center ("MDC") (Dkt. No. 346). The Government conferred with legal counsel at the MDC in response to the Court's Order and was informed of the following: As a general matter, legal mail from a defendant's counsel is delivered to the defendant within one business day of receipt at the MDC. Legal mail sent to a defendant from the Government via FedEx goes to the MDC's warehouse. Staff at the MDC's warehouse process and log the mail in a tracking system and then contact the relevant department—in this case, the legal department—about the mail. The legal department has to then go to the warehouse to retrieve the mail, log the mail, assign the mail an internal number for tracking purposes, and fill out a form authorizing the delivery of the mail to the inmate before delivering the mail to the inmate. Legal counsel at the MDC has explained to the Government that these are the MDC's EFTA00027753 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 350 Filed 10/15/21 Page 2 of 3 Page 2 standard procedures for legal mail, and these protocols apply to each one of the approximately 1,700 inmates at the MDC. Legal counsel at the MDC has further explained that defense counsel's request that the MDC be ordered to provide the defendant with all legal mail within one day of receipt by the MDC would be extremely burdensome and is not practicable in light of the various responsibilities of the MDC's legal department, which is responsible for issues relating to the approximately 1,700 inmates at the MDC. The Government respectfully submits that there are no circumstances that merit special expedited delivery for this defendant, and that the delivery of the defendant's mail should not receive priority over the services the legal department's staff provides to other inmates. As noted in the defense's letter, the Government sent a hard drive containing Court-ordered disclosures to the defendant via FedEx on October 11, 2021. The hard drive was received by the MDC on October 12, 2021. Legal counsel at the MDC informed the Government that there was an institutional emergency impacting the safety and security of the MDC on October 13, 2021, such that no inmate at the MDC received any legal mail from the warehouse that day. On the morning of October 14, 2021, legal counsel at the MDC personally delivered the hard drive to the defendant. The Government has made best efforts to obtain accurate information and respond to the Court's Order within a short time frame. Should the Court have any questions or require any additional details regarding this topic, the Government will confer with legal counsel at the MDC and provide additional information. EFTA00027754 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 350 Filed 10/15/21 Page 3 of 3 Page 3 Respectfully submitted, DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney By: c/ Assistant United States Attorneys Southern District of New York Cc: Defense Counsel (By ECF) Based on the information in this letter, the Court will not enter the Defendant's requested order. See Dkt. No. 346. However, it is the Court's firm expectation that a defendant in a pre-trial posture like Ms. Maxwell will in most circumstances receive legal mail within approximately 1 business day. Going forward, if another delay occurs, the Defendant may renew the request for a specific order requiring delivery within that time frame. With this understanding and in light of the unusually early pre-trial disclosure schedule set by the Court, the Court remains confident that Ms. Maxwell and her attorneys are fully able to prepare for trial. This resolves Dkt. No. 346. SO ORDERED. Oi 10/15/21 EFTA00027755

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #1:20-CR-00330-AJN

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedTestimonyUnknown

Court Transcript: 777

The transcript records a court session where the judge addresses jury requests for transcripts of certain witnesses and clarification on the deliberation schedule over the New Year's holiday period. The judge discusses the schedule with counsel and decides to instruct the jury to continue deliberations as needed, including on December 31 and January 1, unless they have unmoveable commitments.

26p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 549

The government files a letter with the court regarding the anticipated testimony of law enforcement agents and the boundaries of cross-examination, citing prior court rulings and relevant case law. The government objects to certain lines of questioning by the defense, including those related to investigative techniques and motives. The letter is submitted in advance of the agents' testimony.

2p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00010037

0p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 650

The United States Attorney's office requests that the court exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act from April 1, 2022, to April 22, 2022, due to pending post-trial motions in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense counsel consents to this request. The court had previously excluded time through April 1, 2022, to allow the parties to research and brief post-trial motions.

2p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Order: 637

The court order compels a witness to testify at a hearing in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, despite their invocation of the Fifth Amendment, and grants them immunity from prosecution for their testimony. The order was approved by the Department of Justice and signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan. The witness's testimony is deemed necessary to the public interest.

2p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 372

The document is a letter from the United States Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the jury selection process in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The government requests clarification on when the parties will be provided with the names of prospective jurors and suggests that peremptory challenges be exercised at the conclusion of voir dire. The government argues that providing juror names weeks in advance is not necessary and could be unusual.

3p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.