EFTA00031442

EFTA00023532

Ghislaine Maxwell Supreme Court petition

No. 24-____ WILSON-EPES PRINTING CO., INC. – (202) 789-0096 – WASHINGTON, D.C. 20002 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ———— GHISLAINE MAXWELL, AKA SEALED DEFENDANT 1, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ———— On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ———— PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI ———— DAVID OSCAR MARKUS Counsel of Record MARKUS/MOSS PLLC 40 N.W. Third Street Penthouse One Miami, FL 33128 (30

Court Filing - Letter to the Judge: 313

The letter, submitted by Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel, responds to the court's order regarding alleged violations of Local Criminal Rule 23.1. It argues that the government's complaints about certain public statements are unfounded and highlights the government's own violations of the rule, as well as those of the accusers' counsel. The letter requests the court to consider the double standard in applying the rule.

Maxwell Petition

No. 24-____ WILSON-EPES PRINTING CO., INC. – (202) 789-0096 – WASHINGTON, D.C. 20002 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ———— GHISLAINE MAXWELL, AKA SEALED DEFENDANT 1, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ———— On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ———— PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI ———— DAVID OSCAR MARKUS Counsel of Record MARKUS/MOSS PLLC 40 N.W. Third Street Penthouse One Miami, FL 33128 (30

Court Filing - Letter to Judge: 352

Defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim writes to Judge Alison J. Nathan, criticizing the government's response to delayed delivery of Ghislaine Maxwell's legal mail and arguing that the situation is untenable and violates Maxwell's constitutional rights. Sternheim requests the court to reconsider Maxwell's detention.

Court Transcript: 777

The transcript records a court session where the judge addresses jury requests for transcripts of certain witnesses and clarification on the deliberation schedule over the New Year's holiday period. The judge discusses the schedule with counsel and decides to instruct the jury to continue deliberations as needed, including on December 31 and January 1, unless they have unmoveable commitments.