LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM
LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM Main Cell Fax August 24, 2021 Honorable J. Nathan United States District Judge United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The government cannot resist the opportunity to gratuitously cast Ghislaine Maxwell in a negative light while it defends the Metropolitan Detention Center at all costs, regardless of the facts. [Dkt. 326]. The government accuses Ms. Maxwell of using a cart to barricade the door to the VTC room. The cart was never used to barricade. The government has chosen to make this an issue - when it never was - to justify the restriction placed on the amount of legal materials Ms. Maxwell can bring into the VTC room on any given day. The government mischaracterizes facts to which it does not have first-hand knowledge. Ms. Maxwell continues to use the cart daily to bring legal material into the VTC room and to remove those docume
Summary
LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM Main Cell Fax August 24, 2021 Honorable J. Nathan United States District Judge United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The government cannot resist the opportunity to gratuitously cast Ghislaine Maxwell in a negative light while it defends the Metropolitan Detention Center at all costs, regardless of the facts. [Dkt. 326]. The government accuses Ms. Maxwell of using a cart to barricade the door to the VTC room. The cart was never used to barricade. The government has chosen to make this an issue - when it never was - to justify the restriction placed on the amount of legal materials Ms. Maxwell can bring into the VTC room on any given day. The government mischaracterizes facts to which it does not have first-hand knowledge. Ms. Maxwell continues to use the cart daily to bring legal material into the VTC room and to remove those docume
Persons Referenced (2)
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Related Documents (6)
Court Filing: 133
Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team files a motion to suppress evidence obtained from a government subpoena and to dismiss Counts Five and Six of the indictment, citing the Due Process Clause. The motion is supported by a memorandum of law and exhibits. The defense attorneys representing Maxwell are listed, along with their contact information.
This is a reply memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys in support of her renewed motion f...
This is a reply memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys in support of her renewed motion for bail in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The document is part of the criminal case proceedings against Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The memorandum is submitted by her legal team, including attorneys from Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
Court Filing: 407
The document is a court filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel requesting the release of potential jurors' names to attorneys, citing concerns about the ability to conduct background research and ensure a fair trial. The filing references relevant case law and bar association opinions to support the request.
EFTA00019897
Defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim writes to Judge Alison J. Nathan, criticizing the government's r...
Defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim writes to Judge Alison J. Nathan, criticizing the government's response to delayed delivery of Ghislaine Maxwell's legal mail and arguing that the situation is untenable and violates Maxwell's constitutional rights. Sternheim requests the court to reconsider Maxwell's detention.
Defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim writes to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the late delivery of ...
Defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim writes to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the late delivery of government disclosures to Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC. The judge orders the government to send materials via FedEx with tracking information to resolve the issue before the trial starts in two weeks.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.