GG COHEN & GRESSER LLP
GG COHEN & GRESSER LLP ongesseccom Mark S. Cohen Christian R. Eveniell December 8, 2020 TO BE FILED UNDER SEAL VIA EMAIL (SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 2(B1 OF JUDGE NATHAN'S INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES IN CRIMINAL CASES) The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Judge Nathan: On behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell, and pursuant to the Court's order (Dkt. 89), we respectfully submit under seal two versions of the Memorandum of Ghislaine Maxwell in Support of Her Renewed Motion for Bail (the "Motion") and accompanying exhibits: an unredacted original to be kept under seal and a version for public filing with proposed narrowly tailored redactions. The proposed redactions are based on the following: (1) privacy concerns, as articulated in our letters of November 25, 2020 (Dkt. 86) and November 30, 2020 (Dkt. 87); and (2) th
Summary
GG COHEN & GRESSER LLP ongesseccom Mark S. Cohen Christian R. Eveniell December 8, 2020 TO BE FILED UNDER SEAL VIA EMAIL (SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 2(B1 OF JUDGE NATHAN'S INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES IN CRIMINAL CASES) The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Judge Nathan: On behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell, and pursuant to the Court's order (Dkt. 89), we respectfully submit under seal two versions of the Memorandum of Ghislaine Maxwell in Support of Her Renewed Motion for Bail (the "Motion") and accompanying exhibits: an unredacted original to be kept under seal and a version for public filing with proposed narrowly tailored redactions. The proposed redactions are based on the following: (1) privacy concerns, as articulated in our letters of November 25, 2020 (Dkt. 86) and November 30, 2020 (Dkt. 87); and (2) th
Persons Referenced (2)
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
referenceRelated Documents (6)
Defense attorney Christian R. Everdell requests that the court order the MDC to accept two hard driv...
Defense attorney Christian R. Everdell requests that the court order the MDC to accept two hard drives containing non-Highly Confidential discovery materials for Ghislaine Maxwell's use. The hard drives are organized in a user-friendly format, and the government does not object to the request. The MDC Legal Department has expressed concerns and is given the opportunity to note objections.
Declaration in Support of Motion to Withdraw as Co-Counsel: 798-1
Christian R. Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP declares that the firm is withdrawing as co-counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell with her consent, as Markus Moss PLLC has taken over her representation for the government's motion to unseal grand jury transcripts. Cohen & Gresser LLP represented Maxwell during her trial and sentencing but not in her appellate proceedings. The firm will share its files with Markus Moss PLLC upon request.
EFTA00019897
Court Filing: 133
Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team files a motion to suppress evidence obtained from a government subpoena and to dismiss Counts Five and Six of the indictment, citing the Due Process Clause. The motion is supported by a memorandum of law and exhibits. The defense attorneys representing Maxwell are listed, along with their contact information.
Court filings: 8
The documents include court filings related to the cases of Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The first filing concerns the scheduling of Maxwell's arraignment and bail hearing, while the second is related to Epstein's bail motion and financial disclosure.
Court Filing - Letter to Judge: Case1:20-cr-03320-AJN Document 292 Filed 08/27/20 Page 20 of 1164
The defense attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell request a protective order from Judge Alison J. Nathan to govern the handling of discovery materials. The parties have reached agreement on most provisions but remain at odds over restrictions on government witnesses and the disclosure of alleged victim identities.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.