From: '
From: ' To: ' Subject: RE: Epstein and SDNY in 2016 Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 14:33:05 +0000 Indeed. From: I Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 10:32 AM To: Subject: FW: Epstein and SONY in 2016 I think might beg to differ. From: Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 10:10 AM To: Cc: Subject: Re: Epstein and SDNY in 2016 A long story, especially for the News, but not an especially bad one, I didn't think. Chief Public Information Officer U.S. Attorney's Office, SDNY On Oct 13, 2020, at 9:02 AM, > wrote: https://www.nydailynews.coranew-york/ny-jeffrey-epstein-maxwell-case-20201013-jmzhl7zdrzdgrbbs7yc6bfnszu- story.html Sent from my iPhone On Oct 12, 2020, at 5:02 PM, wrote: Ok. Thanks, all. Chief Public Information Officer EFTA00066044 U.S. Attorneys Office, SDNY On Oct 12, 2020, at 5:01 PM, wrote: Agreed. To my knowledge, we've never spoken to about or heard about a second meeting or a meeting about a perjury charge, so while I don't know that such a meeting occurr
Summary
From: ' To: ' Subject: RE: Epstein and SDNY in 2016 Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 14:33:05 +0000 Indeed. From: I Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 10:32 AM To: Subject: FW: Epstein and SONY in 2016 I think might beg to differ. From: Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 10:10 AM To: Cc: Subject: Re: Epstein and SDNY in 2016 A long story, especially for the News, but not an especially bad one, I didn't think. Chief Public Information Officer U.S. Attorney's Office, SDNY On Oct 13, 2020, at 9:02 AM, > wrote: https://www.nydailynews.coranew-york/ny-jeffrey-epstein-maxwell-case-20201013-jmzhl7zdrzdgrbbs7yc6bfnszu- story.html Sent from my iPhone On Oct 12, 2020, at 5:02 PM, wrote: Ok. Thanks, all. Chief Public Information Officer EFTA00066044 U.S. Attorneys Office, SDNY On Oct 12, 2020, at 5:01 PM, wrote: Agreed. To my knowledge, we've never spoken to about or heard about a second meeting or a meeting about a perjury charge, so while I don't know that such a meeting occurr
Persons Referenced (3)
“...fort went nowhere, as far as the victims' attorneys know. Then, after attorneys David Boies and Sigrid McCawley took Maxwell's depositions in the case, Boies re-approach...”
Peter Skinner“...On Feb. 29, 2016, Epstein victims' attorneys Stan Pottinger, Brad Edwards and Peter Skinner met with then-AUSA and pitched her on an investigation of the Epstein scheme....”
Bradley EdwardsTags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (3)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
sbrownpnydailynews.com917-589-9831https://www.nydailynews.coranew-york/ny-jeffrey-epstein-maxwell-case-20201013-jmzhl7zdrzdgrbbs7yc6bfnszuRelated Documents (6)
mid Avenue
mid Avenue COHEN & GRESSER LLP October 13, 2020 BY EMAIL , Esq. Esq. Esq. United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear We write on behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell, to set forth requests for discovery and Brady material. Based on our review of the government's productions of August 5, 2019, August 13, 2019, and August 21, 2020, we make the following requests for discovery, inspection, and copying, in accordance with the guarantees of the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments, Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Federal Rules of Evidence, and such other laws and rules as may be applicable. We are still reviewing these productions, as well as the government's most recent production of October 2, 2020, and reserve the right to supplement these requests as necessary. 1. We request any oral, written, or recorded statements made by Ms. Maxwell, aside
COHEN & GRESSER LLP
ANnW COHEN & GRESSER LLP October 13, 2020 BY EMAIL United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear ..,-:,w.cohengessercom We write on behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell, to set forth requests for discovery and Brady material. Based on our review of the government's productions of August 5, 2019, August 13, 2019, and August 21, 2020, we make the following requests for discovery, inspection, and copying, in accordance with the guarantees of the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments, Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Federal Rules of Evidence, and such other laws and rules as may be applicable. We are still reviewing these productions, as well as the government's most recent production of October 2, 2020, and reserve the right to supplement these requests as necessary. 1. We request any oral, written, or recorded statements made by
EFTA00023053
COHEN & GRESSER LLP
GG COHEN & GRESSER LLP Christian R. Evercle11 +1 (212) 957-7600 ccvcrdclIgathcngresscr.com October 13, 2020 BY EMAIL. , Esq. Esq. Esq. United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear 000 Thud Avenue New Yoek. NY 10022 +1 212 957 7600 phone owswoohensresser corn We write on behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell, to set forth requests for discovery and Brady material. Based on our review of the government's productions of August 5, 2019, August 13, 2019, and August 21, 2020, we make the following requests for discovery, inspection, and copying, in accordance with the guarantees of the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments, Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Federal Rules of Evidence, and such other laws and rules as may be applicable. We are still reviewing these productions, as well as the government's most recent production of
COHEN & GRESSER LLP
COHEN & GRESSER LLP .,:m.cohengesser <cm October 13, 2020 BY EMAIL United States Attorney's Office w York Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear We write on behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell, to set forth requests for discovery and Brady material. Based on our review of the government's productions of August 5, 2019, August 13, 2019, and August 21, 2020, we make the following requests for discovery, inspection, and copying, in accordance with the guarantees of the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments, Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Federal Rules of Evidence, and such other laws and rules as may be applicable. We are still reviewing these productions, as well as the government's most recent production of October 2, 2020, and reserve the right to supplement these requests as necessary. 1. We request any oral, written, or recorded statements made by Ms. Maxwell, aside from the statements made in prior civil case proceed
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x 20 Cr. 330 (MN) REPLY MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF HER MOTION UNDER THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE TO SUPPRESS ALL EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE GOVERNMENT'S SUBPOENA TO BOLES SCHILLER AND TO DISMISS COUNTS FIVE AND SIX Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, CO 80203 Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim 33 West 19th Street - 4th Floor New York, NY 10011 Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00077571 Table of Contents Table of Contents Table of Authorities ii Table of Exhibits iv Introduction and Summary of the Argument 1 I. The Facts 2 II. The Government's Response to Maxwell's Motion. 6 A. The Government's Defenses Are Not Credible. 7 B. Assuming the Government's De
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.