Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00066570DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: '

From: ' ) 11 `1 To: ' " Cc: ' Subject: RE: GM Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 16:15:50 +0000 Yes, conferred this morning, still disagree on the main points. We expect to have a draft letter to you by 2:00. And I think I= may be getting a little ahead of himself — although Visoski had the CPB officer's number in his phone, he didn't remember the guy, didn't think he was friends with Epstein, and didn't know of any significant connection between the two, much less anything nefarious. We're going to have those agents join our interview of him, but I personally wouldn't describe it as promising at this stage. From: Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 12:13 To: Cc: Subject: GM C < Hey Guys — Have you conferred yet with Maxwell's attorneys? I'm assuming we still plan/need to put in a letter by 5? Second, just got a call from =Taylor — understand we got an attorney proffer from counsel for Larry Visoski on the potential CBP angle and that the proffer was promising? Not urgent but next ti

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00066570
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity

Summary

From: ' ) 11 `1 To: ' " Cc: ' Subject: RE: GM Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 16:15:50 +0000 Yes, conferred this morning, still disagree on the main points. We expect to have a draft letter to you by 2:00. And I think I= may be getting a little ahead of himself — although Visoski had the CPB officer's number in his phone, he didn't remember the guy, didn't think he was friends with Epstein, and didn't know of any significant connection between the two, much less anything nefarious. We're going to have those agents join our interview of him, but I personally wouldn't describe it as promising at this stage. From: Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 12:13 To: Cc: Subject: GM C < Hey Guys — Have you conferred yet with Maxwell's attorneys? I'm assuming we still plan/need to put in a letter by 5? Second, just got a call from =Taylor — understand we got an attorney proffer from counsel for Larry Visoski on the potential CBP angle and that the proffer was promising? Not urgent but next ti

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: ' ) 11 `1 To: ' " Cc: ' Subject: RE: GM Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 16:15:50 +0000 Yes, conferred this morning, still disagree on the main points. We expect to have a draft letter to you by 2:00. And I think I= may be getting a little ahead of himself — although Visoski had the CPB officer's number in his phone, he didn't remember the guy, didn't think he was friends with Epstein, and didn't know of any significant connection between the two, much less anything nefarious. We're going to have those agents join our interview of him, but I personally wouldn't describe it as promising at this stage. From: Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 12:13 To: Cc: Subject: GM C < Hey Guys — Have you conferred yet with Maxwell's attorneys? I'm assuming we still plan/need to put in a letter by 5? Second, just got a call from =Taylor — understand we got an attorney proffer from counsel for Larry Visoski on the potential CBP angle and that the proffer was promising? Not urgent but next time we chat, let's discuss that as well. Thanks, EFTA00066570

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.