Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00067099DOJ Data Set 9Other

Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Proposed Jury Questionnaires

From: To: Cc: Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Proposed Jury Questionnaires Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2021 18:25:37 +0000 Attachments: JOINT_Proposed_Voir Dire_SentiReponse_to_Defense_v1).docx; JOINT_Proposediury_QuestionnaireiGovit_Response_to_Defense_v2).docx Thanks again for the very helpful guidance. Attaching our proposed drafts to send to the defense. Their language that we disagree with is in red and our proposed language that they rejected is in blue. We flagged footnote 2 and 3 of the questionnaire if there is additional language you think we should add. When we email the defense, we plan to talk to them about the victim names being included in the questionnaire and go from there. We figured it was worth seeing if they will agree to the small edits in track changes on the charges and on trial length (since we have a letter due on Tuesday). The questionnaire formatting is finnicky, so if you prefer to chat through something please let us know. We would like to send the docs to them

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00067099
Pages
4
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

From: To: Cc: Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Proposed Jury Questionnaires Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2021 18:25:37 +0000 Attachments: JOINT_Proposed_Voir Dire_SentiReponse_to_Defense_v1).docx; JOINT_Proposediury_QuestionnaireiGovit_Response_to_Defense_v2).docx Thanks again for the very helpful guidance. Attaching our proposed drafts to send to the defense. Their language that we disagree with is in red and our proposed language that they rejected is in blue. We flagged footnote 2 and 3 of the questionnaire if there is additional language you think we should add. When we email the defense, we plan to talk to them about the victim names being included in the questionnaire and go from there. We figured it was worth seeing if they will agree to the small edits in track changes on the charges and on trial length (since we have a letter due on Tuesday). The questionnaire formatting is finnicky, so if you prefer to chat through something please let us know. We would like to send the docs to them

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: Cc: Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Proposed Jury Questionnaires Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2021 18:25:37 +0000 Attachments: JOINT_Proposed_Voir Dire_SentiReponse_to_Defense_v1).docx; JOINT_Proposediury_QuestionnaireiGovit_Response_to_Defense_v2).docx Thanks again for the very helpful guidance. Attaching our proposed drafts to send to the defense. Their language that we disagree with is in red and our proposed language that they rejected is in blue. We flagged footnote 2 and 3 of the questionnaire if there is additional language you think we should add. When we email the defense, we plan to talk to them about the victim names being included in the questionnaire and go from there. We figured it was worth seeing if they will agree to the small edits in track changes on the charges and on trial length (since we have a letter due on Tuesday). The questionnaire formatting is finnicky, so if you prefer to chat through something please let us know. We would like to send the docs to them this afternoon in order to meet the deadline tomorrow. Thanksl From Sent• un a c o er : To: Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Proposed Jury Questionnaires One other global thought/objection: they have a lot of questions that are framed in a very argumentative way. The court should ask these things neutrally if at all. Sent from my iPhone EFTA00067099 EFTA00067100 EFTA00067101 EFTA00067102

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.