Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00067453DOJ Data Set 9Other

Subject: RE: Epstein -- Call with Roy Black

From: To: Subject: RE: Epstein -- Call with Roy Black Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:20:12 +0000 Importance: Normal Nothing that I know of by way of final decision. From: Sent:\ e nes ay, une , To: Cc: Subject: Epstein -- Call with Roy Black and I spoke with Roy. Roy said that he had called because he had heard that had discussed the matter with Barry Krischer and Roy wanted to see if there was any way to wrap this up before July 7th. Roy also said that he had seen a letter from Jeff Sloman that said that the matter of incarceration would be left to the State. (I am not certain what letter he is referring to, but I thinkMwrote a letter about not taking a position on where Epstein would be incarcerated, not the length of time.) So, Roy wondered whether we would go away if Epstein took Barry's 60-day deal. explained that had not had substantive discussions with Barry about the case and that all communication regarding the case is being handled by and me. In response to

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00067453
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity

Summary

From: To: Subject: RE: Epstein -- Call with Roy Black Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:20:12 +0000 Importance: Normal Nothing that I know of by way of final decision. From: Sent:\ e nes ay, une , To: Cc: Subject: Epstein -- Call with Roy Black and I spoke with Roy. Roy said that he had called because he had heard that had discussed the matter with Barry Krischer and Roy wanted to see if there was any way to wrap this up before July 7th. Roy also said that he had seen a letter from Jeff Sloman that said that the matter of incarceration would be left to the State. (I am not certain what letter he is referring to, but I thinkMwrote a letter about not taking a position on where Epstein would be incarcerated, not the length of time.) So, Roy wondered whether we would go away if Epstein took Barry's 60-day deal. explained that had not had substantive discussions with Barry about the case and that all communication regarding the case is being handled by and me. In response to

Persons Referenced (2)

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: Subject: RE: Epstein -- Call with Roy Black Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:20:12 +0000 Importance: Normal Nothing that I know of by way of final decision. From: Sent: \ e nes ay, une , To: Cc: Subject: Epstein -- Call with Roy Black and I spoke with Roy. Roy said that he had called because he had heard that had discussed the matter with Barry Krischer and Roy wanted to see if there was any way to wrap this up before July 7th. Roy also said that he had seen a letter from Jeff Sloman that said that the matter of incarceration would be left to the State. (I am not certain what letter he is referring to, but I thinkMwrote a letter about not taking a position on where Epstein would be incarcerated, not the length of time.) So, Roy wondered whether we would go away if Epstein took Barry's 60-day deal. explained that had not had substantive discussions with Barry about the case and that all communication regarding the case is being handled by and me. In response to the question of whether there was anything that could "make this go away," we said that our position is that if Epstein stops the process in Washington and in accordance with the terms of the signed agreement, then we will perform pursuant to the agreement. explained that if Epstein pleads to something else or gets sentenced to a lower amount, then we will consi er t at a breach of our agreement and we will proceed accordingly. On that note, has there been any word from Washington? Thank you. Assistant U.S. Attorney Phone) Fax EFTA00067453

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Wire Refreferring

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01659959

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Olt LexisNexis°

14p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-MarratIVIatthewman JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG Pursuant to the Court's June 18, 2013 Omnibus Order (DE 190), the Respondent, United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Third Supplemental Privilege Log. The index has been marked with Bates Numbers P-014924 thru P-015267. The documents referenced in the Third Supplemental Privilege Log will be delivered tomorrow to the Chambers of U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra for ex parte in camera review, pursuant to the Court's Omnibus Order. Respectfully submitted, WIFREDO A. FERRER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: s/A. Marie Villafafia A. MARIE VILLAFAFIA Assistant United States Attorney Florida Bar No. 0018255 500 South Australian Ave, Suite 40

446p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01659959

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 1 of 57

57p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

EFTA00208419

EFTA00208419 01:50 PM Subject: From: John Connolly Vanity Fair magazine Please confirm receipt. It was a pleasure speaking with you this morning. As per your request here are questions I would like to have answered for a piece I am researching on Jeffrey Epstein. As life would have it I am going to be on a busman's holiday this coming week on Singer Island, FL. I would like to meet you and whomever else you think I should speak with. If not, I understand perfectly. Let me preface these questions by saying that AUS.6 who was in charge of the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein has a remarkably record as a prosecutor. I also know that an AUSA does not have the authority to grant a potential defendant a non -prosecution agreement without the permission of higher ups in the Justice Department. Not quite three years ago, the US Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, granted Jeffrey Epstein a non- prosecution agreement in return for his accepting a FL State plea deal for his

4p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.