Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00068406DOJ Data Set 9Other

Cc: "MIM, 1.

From: To: Cc: "MIM, 1. 11.1 1 r liw YSContractor (USANYS)" Subject: RE: FBI remarks Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2019 19:56:25 +0000 Importance: Normal Circling back on this from earlier this week, I don't know if this is still the operative draft, but two quick things we may want to convey on the remarks. First, page one, 2002-2005 is a four year period (not three); second, page two, there's no allegation (and it's not factually correct) that the victims "were made to give" massages — it would be accurate, though, to say "... who gave Epstein massages ..." Also this may just be me, but I think of a "child" as being pre-puberty — I think is going to say "underage girls" if they want to be consistent? — but of course defer to the FBI on their nomenclature. From: (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2019 19:27 To: (USANYS) (USANYS) aa• Cc: (USANYS) [Contractor] cM M ); (USANYS) < Subject: FBI remarks Hi all, Please see the attached draft remarks from the FBI. I looked th

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00068406
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

From: To: Cc: "MIM, 1. 11.1 1 r liw YSContractor (USANYS)" Subject: RE: FBI remarks Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2019 19:56:25 +0000 Importance: Normal Circling back on this from earlier this week, I don't know if this is still the operative draft, but two quick things we may want to convey on the remarks. First, page one, 2002-2005 is a four year period (not three); second, page two, there's no allegation (and it's not factually correct) that the victims "were made to give" massages — it would be accurate, though, to say "... who gave Epstein massages ..." Also this may just be me, but I think of a "child" as being pre-puberty — I think is going to say "underage girls" if they want to be consistent? — but of course defer to the FBI on their nomenclature. From: (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2019 19:27 To: (USANYS) (USANYS) aa• Cc: (USANYS) [Contractor] cM M ); (USANYS) < Subject: FBI remarks Hi all, Please see the attached draft remarks from the FBI. I looked th

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: Cc: "MIM, 1. 11.1 1 r liw YSContractor (USANYS)" Subject: RE: FBI remarks Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2019 19:56:25 +0000 Importance: Normal Circling back on this from earlier this week, I don't know if this is still the operative draft, but two quick things we may want to convey on the remarks. First, page one, 2002-2005 is a four year period (not three); second, page two, there's no allegation (and it's not factually correct) that the victims "were made to give" massages — it would be accurate, though, to say "... who gave Epstein massages ..." Also this may just be me, but I think of a "child" as being pre-puberty — I think is going to say "underage girls" if they want to be consistent? — but of course defer to the FBI on their nomenclature. From: (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2019 19:27 To: (USANYS) (USANYS) aa• Cc: (USANYS) [Contractor] cM M ); (USANYS) < Subject: FBI remarks Hi all, Please see the attached draft remarks from the FBI. I looked them over quickly and they seem to track ours pretty closely. Let me know if you see any issues. Thanks. EFTA00068406

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.