Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00068410DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: Brian Bums

From: Brian Bums To: Cc: "ceverdel "bestemlielin (USANYS)" Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Subpoena fo Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2021 19:44:11 +0000 Attachments: 2021.11.15_-_ 1 - Letter from Patrick J. Smith to Judge_Nathan.pdf Jeff Pagliuca Inline-Images: image001.gif; image002.jpg Counsel - We are required to file our Nov. 15 letter to Judge Nathan on the public docket by tomorrow (copy attached for reference). We do not intend to apply any redactions. I assume that neither the government nor the defense proposes any redactions to this letter, but I'd appreciate confirmation before we file. Thanks, Brian T. Burns Smith Villazor LLP From: Sent: Wednesday, To: Jeff Pagliuca November 17, 2021 9:27 PM Brian Burns (USANYS) Subject: (EXTERNAL EMAIL] RE: Subpoena for Jordana Feldman >; Laura Menninger Thanks, Jeff. Brian, in light of Jeff's email, attached is the unredacted defense motion. Thanks. From: Jeff Pagliuca Sent: Wednesda November 17 2021 9:07 PM To: Brian Burns Cc:

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00068410
Pages
3
Persons
3
Integrity

Summary

From: Brian Bums To: Cc: "ceverdel "bestemlielin (USANYS)" Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Subpoena fo Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2021 19:44:11 +0000 Attachments: 2021.11.15_-_ 1 - Letter from Patrick J. Smith to Judge_Nathan.pdf Jeff Pagliuca Inline-Images: image001.gif; image002.jpg Counsel - We are required to file our Nov. 15 letter to Judge Nathan on the public docket by tomorrow (copy attached for reference). We do not intend to apply any redactions. I assume that neither the government nor the defense proposes any redactions to this letter, but I'd appreciate confirmation before we file. Thanks, Brian T. Burns Smith Villazor LLP From: Sent: Wednesday, To: Jeff Pagliuca November 17, 2021 9:27 PM Brian Burns (USANYS) Subject: (EXTERNAL EMAIL] RE: Subpoena for Jordana Feldman >; Laura Menninger Thanks, Jeff. Brian, in light of Jeff's email, attached is the unredacted defense motion. Thanks. From: Jeff Pagliuca Sent: Wednesda November 17 2021 9:07 PM To: Brian Burns Cc:

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Brian Bums To: Cc: "ceverdel "bestemlielin (USANYS)" Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Subpoena fo Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2021 19:44:11 +0000 Attachments: 2021.11.15_-_ 1 - Letter from Patrick J. Smith to Judge_Nathan.pdf Jeff Pagliuca Inline-Images: image001.gif; image002.jpg Counsel - We are required to file our Nov. 15 letter to Judge Nathan on the public docket by tomorrow (copy attached for reference). We do not intend to apply any redactions. I assume that neither the government nor the defense proposes any redactions to this letter, but I'd appreciate confirmation before we file. Thanks, Brian T. Burns Smith Villazor LLP From: Sent: Wednesday, To: Jeff Pagliuca November 17, 2021 9:27 PM Brian Burns (USANYS) Subject: (EXTERNAL EMAIL] RE: Subpoena for Jordana Feldman >; Laura Menninger Thanks, Jeff. Brian, in light of Jeff's email, attached is the unredacted defense motion. Thanks. From: Jeff Pagliuca Sent: Wednesda November 17 2021 9:07 PM To: Brian Burns Cc: ceverdel Subject: (EXTERNAL] Re: Subpoena fod ; Laura Menninger EFTA00068410 Brian, I believe that we were waiting for any proposed redactions from the government. We have no problem with the government sending you a copy of the motion. If the government does not object, we will send it. However, the government has designated every production confidential, subject to its protective order, and the motion contains information designated as confidential. Accordingly, we will defer to it as to what you should receive. Best Regards, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca. On Nov 17, 2021, at 7:58 PM, Brian Burns wrote: Defense counsel — Would you please provide us a copy of your motion seeking the issuance of this subpoena? We haven't seen a copy. Thank you. Brian T. Burns Smith Villazor LLP From: Christian Everdell Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2021 8:48 PM To: Patrick Smith Cc: Jeff Pagliuca >; ; Brian Burns Laura Menninge (USANYS) Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Subpoena for■ Counsel — Attached please find the signed subpoena foi Regards, Christian R Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Avenue New York. NY 10022 www.cohengresser.com New York I Paris I view bio I Washington DC I London Please acknowledge receipt. BOBBI C STERNHEIM CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended to be reviewed initially by only the individual named above. II the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or a representative of the intended recipient. you are hereby notified that any review. dissemination or copying of this e-mail or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by telephone and permanently delete this e-mail. Thank you. EFTA00068411 PRIVACY: A complete copy of our privacy policy can be ✓owed al httpsActaw.cohengresser.com/privacK-policy EFTA00068412

Technical Artifacts (3)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainhttpsactaw.cohengresser.com
Domainwww.cohengresser.com
Wire Refreference

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 121

Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team filed a motion to dismiss either Count One or Count Three of the superseding indictment, arguing that they are multiplicitous. The motion was filed on January 25, 2021, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The defense team is represented by multiple attorneys from different law firms.

2p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing - Notice of Motion: 125

Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team filed a notice of motion to dismiss the superseding indictment, alleging it was obtained in violation of the Sixth Amendment. The motion is part of the pretrial proceedings in the case against Maxwell. Oral argument has been requested.

2p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 123

Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team filed a motion to dismiss Counts One through Four of the superseding indictment for lack of specificity. The motion was filed on January 25, 2021, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The defense team is represented by multiple attorneys from different law firms.

2p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 133

Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team files a motion to suppress evidence obtained from a government subpoena and to dismiss Counts Five and Six of the indictment, citing the Due Process Clause. The motion is supported by a memorandum of law and exhibits. The defense attorneys representing Maxwell are listed, along with their contact information.

2p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing - Notice of Electronic Filing: 21-2

The document is a notice of electronic filing from the US District Court, Southern District of New York, indicating that the appeal record in USA v. Maxwell has been transmitted to the US Court of Appeals. It includes details about the case, the charges against Ghislaine Maxwell, and the attorneys involved. The case involves charges of conspiracy, enticement, and transportation of minors for illegal sex acts, among others.

24p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

Stipulation Agreement: doj-ogr-00015165

The document is a stipulation agreement between the prosecution and defense in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, agreeing to admit Defense Exhibit A1 into evidence at trial, dated December 17, 2021.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.