HADDON
HADDON MORGAN FOREMAN November 27, 2021 United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Counsel: Haddon. Morgan and Foreman, Pc Laura A. Menninger www.hmftaw.com I write pursuant to the Court's Order of November 23, 2021 directing a supplement to the disclosure for Certified Forensic Examine expert opinion to the extent he intends to offer rebuttal testimony to any opinions offered in the government's original disclosure for Stephen Flatley, dated September 15, 2021. I note that yesterday you provided a supplemental notice for Mr. Flatley. That supplement was untimely. Thus, we intend to object at trial to the admission of any opinions from Mr. Flatley not included in your September 15, 2021 disclosure. This supplement for Mr. does not purport to respond to anything contained in your Flatley supplement. We anticipate that Mr. will testify about the meaning of certain pieces of metadata as
Summary
HADDON MORGAN FOREMAN November 27, 2021 United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Counsel: Haddon. Morgan and Foreman, Pc Laura A. Menninger www.hmftaw.com I write pursuant to the Court's Order of November 23, 2021 directing a supplement to the disclosure for Certified Forensic Examine expert opinion to the extent he intends to offer rebuttal testimony to any opinions offered in the government's original disclosure for Stephen Flatley, dated September 15, 2021. I note that yesterday you provided a supplemental notice for Mr. Flatley. That supplement was untimely. Thus, we intend to object at trial to the admission of any opinions from Mr. Flatley not included in your September 15, 2021 disclosure. This supplement for Mr. does not purport to respond to anything contained in your Flatley supplement. We anticipate that Mr. will testify about the meaning of certain pieces of metadata as
Persons Referenced (2)
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
www.hmftaw.comRelated Documents (6)
Maxwell Disputes
Case 18-2868, Document 284, 08/09/2019, 2628244, Page1 of 38 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------X Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. -------------------------------------------------- ............................................. VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, 15-cv-07433-RWS Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiff’s Statement of Contested Facts and Plaintiff’s “Undisputed Facts” Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 56.1 Laura A. M
EFTA00014671
EFTA00021941
EFTA00015186
EFTA00011452
EFTA00028257
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.