Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00073806DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: Christian Everdell

From: Christian Everdell Cc: Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Follow-up Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 16:59:01 +0000 Inline-Images: image001.gif; image002.jpg Thanks for the clarification. As to your first point, we are aware of the requirements of Rule 12.2 and you have made your position on waiver clear. We do not intend to rely on any defense covered by the rule. If this becomes an issue later, you can certainly raise it with the Court. As to your second point, we cannot (and are under no obligation to) disclose our defense strategy. If you feel like you need to move in limine on this issue, you are certainly free to do so. Thanks, Chris From: Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2021 10:40 PM To: Subject: RE: Follow-up Hi Chris, Thanks for your email. On the first issue, we see that you filed a letter with the Court on the subject. On the second issue, we think there may be a bit of confusion. We're asking you two questions separately: 1. Do you intend to offer expert evidence relating

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00073806
Pages
2
Persons
1
Integrity

Summary

From: Christian Everdell Cc: Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Follow-up Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 16:59:01 +0000 Inline-Images: image001.gif; image002.jpg Thanks for the clarification. As to your first point, we are aware of the requirements of Rule 12.2 and you have made your position on waiver clear. We do not intend to rely on any defense covered by the rule. If this becomes an issue later, you can certainly raise it with the Court. As to your second point, we cannot (and are under no obligation to) disclose our defense strategy. If you feel like you need to move in limine on this issue, you are certainly free to do so. Thanks, Chris From: Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2021 10:40 PM To: Subject: RE: Follow-up Hi Chris, Thanks for your email. On the first issue, we see that you filed a letter with the Court on the subject. On the second issue, we think there may be a bit of confusion. We're asking you two questions separately: 1. Do you intend to offer expert evidence relating

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Christian Everdell Cc: Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Follow-up Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 16:59:01 +0000 Inline-Images: image001.gif; image002.jpg Thanks for the clarification. As to your first point, we are aware of the requirements of Rule 12.2 and you have made your position on waiver clear. We do not intend to rely on any defense covered by the rule. If this becomes an issue later, you can certainly raise it with the Court. As to your second point, we cannot (and are under no obligation to) disclose our defense strategy. If you feel like you need to move in limine on this issue, you are certainly free to do so. Thanks, Chris From: Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2021 10:40 PM To: Subject: RE: Follow-up Hi Chris, Thanks for your email. On the first issue, we see that you filed a letter with the Court on the subject. On the second issue, we think there may be a bit of confusion. We're asking you two questions separately: 1. Do you intend to offer expert evidence relating to the defendant's mental condition and bearing on the issue of guilt? If so, and as explained in our letter, we consider it waived under Rule 12.2, and in any event, we sent you a letter yesterday demanding notice so we can raise the issue with the Court if necessary. 2. Do you intend to offer evidence or argument that the defendant is a victim of abuse by Jeffrey Epstein? If so, we are assessing whether we would move on that in limine on Monday, so please let us know as soon as you can. Thanks, From: Christian Everdell Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2021 3:27 PM To: < EFTA00073806 Cc: Subject: (EXTERNAL] Follow-up Alison — As promised, I am following up with you about two issues we discussed on yesterday's call. First, we have given serious consideration to your request to set a briefing schedule for the Rule 412 motion. After reflection, we believe the timeline provided in Rule 412 is appropriate and we do not agree that any earlier briefing schedule makes sense here in light of the fact that we just received the voluminous 3500 materials. Second, we are still considering your request regarding notice under Rule 12.2. You seemed to take the position on our call yesterday that notice under Rule 12.2 is required if we plan to argue that Ms. Maxwell "was a victim in any way." We do not understand Rule 12.2 to be that broad. If you have any authority to substantiate your interpretation, we'd be happy to consider it and then let you know our position. Regards, Chris Christian R Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 I view bio www.cohengresser.com New York I Paris I Washington DC I London CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and/or privileged. This 0.•nd); is Intended to be reviewed initially by only the individual named above. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or a representative of the intended recipient. you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this e-mail or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error. please immediately notify the sender by telephone and permanently delete this e-mail. Thank you. PRIVACY: A complete copy of our privacy policy can be viewed al: MniAvww.cohencressercom/privacy-polic)_ EFTA00073807

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainwww.cohengresser.com
Wire Refreflection

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL'S THIRD MOTION FOR RELEASE ON BAIL Bobbi C. Sternheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00090990 INTRODUCTION Ghislaine Maxwell respectfully submits this Memorandum in Support of her Third Motion for Release on Bail. As Ms. Maxwell has stated on numerous occasions and reaffirms here: she has no intention or desire to leave this country. She is an American citizen, has lived in United States for 30 years, has strong family ties and the support of friends and family residing in this country. She wants nothing more than to remain in the United States under whatever conditions the Court deems necessary so that she can effectively prepare fo

9p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF HER RENEWED MOTION FOR BAIL Mark S. Cohen Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP New York, NY 10022 Phone: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. Denver, CO 80203 Phone: Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim New York, NY 10011 Phone: Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00094289 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 ARGUMENT 7 I. Reconsideration of the Court's Bail Decision is Appropriate Under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(O 7 II. Ms. Maxwell Should Be Granted Bail Under the Proposed Strict Bail Conditions 10 A. Ms. Maxwell Has Deep Family Ties to the United States and Numerous Sureties to Support Her Bond 10 1. Ms. Maxwell is Devoted to Her Spouse and Stepchildren and Would Never Destroy Her Family By Leaving th

45p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00011452

0p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court filings and motions: 38

The documents include court filings related to the cases of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, focusing on issues such as the disclosure of victim identities, protective orders, and access to discovery materials. The filings demonstrate the legal strategies employed by both the prosecution and the defense in these high-profile cases.

17p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

To: Laura Mennin er tennin e

From: To: Laura Mennin er tennin e mflaw.com>, " " • (USANYS)" Cc: Jeff Pagliuca ipagliuca@hmflaw.com>, "Christian R Everdell - Cohen & Gresser LLP (ceverdell@cohengresser.com)" <ceverdell@cohengresser.com>, 'BOBBI C STERNHEIM' <bcstemheim@mac.com> Subject: RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (MN) - Request to view evidence, highly confidential materials, scenes Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2021 22:38:06 +0000 Inline-Images: image001.jpg Counsel, Thank you for your email. Below please find our response. If this is acceptable to you, then we will proceed with arranging the logistics of having your client produced to 500 Pearl the week of April 12th and the week April 19th. We will also arrange for the FBI to transport evidence to 500 Pearl for review the week of April 12rh. Physical Evidence • It is not reasonable or feasible to insist that the FBI bring all physical evidence to 500 Pearl Street. That said, we are certainly willing to work with you to ensure that your client can revi

10p
Court UnsealedCorrespondenceUnknown

Court filings and letters: 30

The documents include a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office regarding Jeffrey Epstein's foreign passport and court filings related to Ghislaine Maxwell's case, focusing on disputes over discovery materials and the disclosure of alleged victims' identities.

8p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.