Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00074139DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: '

From: ' To: "I Cc: "I (USANYS)" hr' Subject: RE: Epstein 6(e) Order Signed and Ready to Pick Up Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2020 21:20:09 +0000 Thanks. Once you've got this, would you mind scanning and sending to M? He just asked for a copy. Thanks From: Sent: Monday, February 3, 2020 11:58 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: Subject: Re: Epstein 6(e) Order Signed and Ready to Pick Up Ah I accidentally read it as Judge-! I'm in court now so will grab it on my way back. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 3, 2020, at 11:36, (USANYS) e > wrote: Thanks, I believe Judge Nathan was the USDJ on Part J. on Friday. From: Sent: Monday, February 3, 202011:34 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: ) 4:== >, Subject: Re: Epstein 6(e) Order Signed and Ready to Pick Up <M > We can pick up ... only thing is, did this not need to go to Part 1? would know better than I whether a mag court order is sufficient, I just ask because I think the prior order was a district judge. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 3, 2020, at 11:25, (USAN

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00074139
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

From: ' To: "I Cc: "I (USANYS)" hr' Subject: RE: Epstein 6(e) Order Signed and Ready to Pick Up Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2020 21:20:09 +0000 Thanks. Once you've got this, would you mind scanning and sending to M? He just asked for a copy. Thanks From: Sent: Monday, February 3, 2020 11:58 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: Subject: Re: Epstein 6(e) Order Signed and Ready to Pick Up Ah I accidentally read it as Judge-! I'm in court now so will grab it on my way back. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 3, 2020, at 11:36, (USANYS) e > wrote: Thanks, I believe Judge Nathan was the USDJ on Part J. on Friday. From: Sent: Monday, February 3, 202011:34 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: ) 4:== >, Subject: Re: Epstein 6(e) Order Signed and Ready to Pick Up <M > We can pick up ... only thing is, did this not need to go to Part 1? would know better than I whether a mag court order is sufficient, I just ask because I think the prior order was a district judge. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 3, 2020, at 11:25, (USAN

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: ' To: "I Cc: "I (USANYS)" hr' Subject: RE: Epstein 6(e) Order Signed and Ready to Pick Up Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2020 21:20:09 +0000 Thanks. Once you've got this, would you mind scanning and sending to M? He just asked for a copy. Thanks From: Sent: Monday, February 3, 2020 11:58 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: Subject: Re: Epstein 6(e) Order Signed and Ready to Pick Up Ah I accidentally read it as Judge-! I'm in court now so will grab it on my way back. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 3, 2020, at 11:36, (USANYS) e > wrote: Thanks, I believe Judge Nathan was the USDJ on Part J. on Friday. From: Sent: Monday, February 3, 202011:34 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: ) 4:== >, Subject: Re: Epstein 6(e) Order Signed and Ready to Pick Up <M > We can pick up ... only thing is, did this not need to go to Part 1? would know better than I whether a mag court order is sufficient, I just ask because I think the prior order was a district judge. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 3, 2020, at 11:25, (USANYS) wrote: Were you guys able to pick this up? If not, can you send a paralegal over to do so today? Thanks. From: McEnany,= (USANYS) Sent: Friday, January 31, 2020 5:23 PM To: Cc: Subject: Epstein 6(e) Order Signed and Ready to Pick Up (USANYS) I just got a call from Judge Nathan's clerk that she signed the order and it's ready to be picked up from her chambers, if one of you want to engineer that right now. EFTA00074139

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.