Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00075808DOJ Data Set 9Other

Subject: RE: Severance opp

From: Cc: 1 Subject: RE: Severance opp Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 01:37:42 +0000 Attachments: Severance_ draft vSlocx Thanks, Well done. Some comments and questions in track. My primary concern is that we may be slightly over-relying on Pomotis and wonder if it is worth doing a bit more with Ruiz and/or Broccolo instead? In particular, as I understand it, in Pomotis, the perjury charges stemmed from the defendant lying to the FBI and then the grand jury about the robbery he was then charged with, and presumably shortly after (or at least not 20 years after) the crime. I do think that is a little different — and the argument for joinder a littler stronger — than our facts, which we may want to acknowledge. That said, I would encourage you to use her own arguments in support of the suppression motions against her — i.e., she herself argues that the risk of criminal prosecution was on her mind at the time of the depositions... From: Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2021 5:43 PM To:

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00075808
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

From: Cc: 1 Subject: RE: Severance opp Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 01:37:42 +0000 Attachments: Severance_ draft vSlocx Thanks, Well done. Some comments and questions in track. My primary concern is that we may be slightly over-relying on Pomotis and wonder if it is worth doing a bit more with Ruiz and/or Broccolo instead? In particular, as I understand it, in Pomotis, the perjury charges stemmed from the defendant lying to the FBI and then the grand jury about the robbery he was then charged with, and presumably shortly after (or at least not 20 years after) the crime. I do think that is a little different — and the argument for joinder a littler stronger — than our facts, which we may want to acknowledge. That said, I would encourage you to use her own arguments in support of the suppression motions against her — i.e., she herself argues that the risk of criminal prosecution was on her mind at the time of the depositions... From: Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2021 5:43 PM To:

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Cc: 1 Subject: RE: Severance opp Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 01:37:42 +0000 Attachments: Severance_ draft vSlocx Thanks, Well done. Some comments and questions in track. My primary concern is that we may be slightly over-relying on Pomotis and wonder if it is worth doing a bit more with Ruiz and/or Broccolo instead? In particular, as I understand it, in Pomotis, the perjury charges stemmed from the defendant lying to the FBI and then the grand jury about the robbery he was then charged with, and presumably shortly after (or at least not 20 years after) the crime. I do think that is a little different — and the argument for joinder a littler stronger — than our facts, which we may want to acknowledge. That said, I would encourage you to use her own arguments in support of the suppression motions against her — i.e., she herself argues that the risk of criminal prosecution was on her mind at the time of the depositions... From: Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2021 5:43 PM To: Subject: Severance opp Hi Attached for your review is a draft of the opposition to Maxwell's motion to sever the perjury counts, along with a copy of that motion. Thanks, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York 1 Saint Andrews Plaza New York, New York 10007 EFTA00075808

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.