Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00077550DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: '

From: ' (USANYS)" To: ' (USANYS)" Cc: ' (USANYS)" Subject: Re: Senate letter Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2019 14:32:20 +0000 I think that's right. Sent from my iPad On Aug 11, 2019, at 10:23 AM, (USANYS) < wrote: You guys have thoughts on this? As knows, OLA's general guidance is either not to respond at all, or to respond by parroting back a combination of the question and stuff already in the public record. Here's my initial effort at mapping that guidance onto this question: From: Berman, Geoffrey (USANYS) Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2019 10:02 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: Re: Senate letter < (USANYS) (USANYS) < >; I think they would like a draft response sometime today. I don't think it's necessary to loop in OLA, but I would draft our response conservatively in accord with their past guidance. Geoff On Aug 11, 2019, at 9:57 AM, (USANYS) wrote: We can put something together - do you have a sense of timing/deadline? Also, for requests made directly to

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00077550
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

From: ' (USANYS)" To: ' (USANYS)" Cc: ' (USANYS)" Subject: Re: Senate letter Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2019 14:32:20 +0000 I think that's right. Sent from my iPad On Aug 11, 2019, at 10:23 AM, (USANYS) < wrote: You guys have thoughts on this? As knows, OLA's general guidance is either not to respond at all, or to respond by parroting back a combination of the question and stuff already in the public record. Here's my initial effort at mapping that guidance onto this question: From: Berman, Geoffrey (USANYS) Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2019 10:02 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: Re: Senate letter < (USANYS) (USANYS) < >; I think they would like a draft response sometime today. I don't think it's necessary to loop in OLA, but I would draft our response conservatively in accord with their past guidance. Geoff On Aug 11, 2019, at 9:57 AM, (USANYS) wrote: We can put something together - do you have a sense of timing/deadline? Also, for requests made directly to

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: ' (USANYS)" To: ' (USANYS)" Cc: ' (USANYS)" Subject: Re: Senate letter Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2019 14:32:20 +0000 I think that's right. Sent from my iPad On Aug 11, 2019, at 10:23 AM, (USANYS) < wrote: You guys have thoughts on this? As knows, OLA's general guidance is either not to respond at all, or to respond by parroting back a combination of the question and stuff already in the public record. Here's my initial effort at mapping that guidance onto this question: From: Berman, Geoffrey (USANYS) Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2019 10:02 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: Re: Senate letter < (USANYS) (USANYS) < >; I think they would like a draft response sometime today. I don't think it's necessary to loop in OLA, but I would draft our response conservatively in accord with their past guidance. Geoff On Aug 11, 2019, at 9:57 AM, (USANYS) wrote: We can put something together - do you have a sense of timing/deadline? Also, for requests made directly to us, we have been looping in OLA which typically wants to be involved and has pretty strong guidance on what, if anything, we should say. I don't know if that's appropriate here given that the request was made directly to OAG, but just wanted to flag. Sent from my iPhone On Aug 11, 2019, at 9:45 AM, Berman, Geoffrey (USANYS) <.. > wrote: See below and attached letter. Can we draft a response for AG to Q 4? Geoff Begin forwarded message: Fro Date: August 11, 2019 at 9:26:42 AM EDT EFTA00077550 To: "Berman, Geoffrey (USANYS)" Subject: Senate letter Geoff: Please see question 4 in the attached letter. I'm not sure exactly what he's asking but can you please provide a preliminary response to Question 4. Thanks. <08-10-2019---sasse-letter-to-ag-barr-re-epstein-suicide.pdf> EFTA00077551

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.