From: '
From: ' (USANYS)" To: ' (USANYS)" Cc: ' (USANYS)" Subject: Re: Senate letter Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2019 14:32:20 +0000 I think that's right. Sent from my iPad On Aug 11, 2019, at 10:23 AM, (USANYS) < wrote: You guys have thoughts on this? As knows, OLA's general guidance is either not to respond at all, or to respond by parroting back a combination of the question and stuff already in the public record. Here's my initial effort at mapping that guidance onto this question: From: Berman, Geoffrey (USANYS) Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2019 10:02 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: Re: Senate letter < (USANYS) (USANYS) < >; I think they would like a draft response sometime today. I don't think it's necessary to loop in OLA, but I would draft our response conservatively in accord with their past guidance. Geoff On Aug 11, 2019, at 9:57 AM, (USANYS) wrote: We can put something together - do you have a sense of timing/deadline? Also, for requests made directly to
Summary
From: ' (USANYS)" To: ' (USANYS)" Cc: ' (USANYS)" Subject: Re: Senate letter Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2019 14:32:20 +0000 I think that's right. Sent from my iPad On Aug 11, 2019, at 10:23 AM, (USANYS) < wrote: You guys have thoughts on this? As knows, OLA's general guidance is either not to respond at all, or to respond by parroting back a combination of the question and stuff already in the public record. Here's my initial effort at mapping that guidance onto this question: From: Berman, Geoffrey (USANYS) Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2019 10:02 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: Re: Senate letter < (USANYS) (USANYS) < >; I think they would like a draft response sometime today. I don't think it's necessary to loop in OLA, but I would draft our response conservatively in accord with their past guidance. Geoff On Aug 11, 2019, at 9:57 AM, (USANYS) wrote: We can put something together - do you have a sense of timing/deadline? Also, for requests made directly to
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.