UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC S. DATE FILED: 11 /1 /21 20-CR-330 (AJN) ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: The Court is in receipt of the parties' proposed redactions to the parties' motions in limine, responses in opposition, replies in support, and related exhibits. As the Court indicated at today's conference, some of the parties' proposed redactions are overbroad considering the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). In particular, for the reasons stated at today's conference, the Court denies the Government's request to redact section ten of the Government's motion in limine. See Dkt. No. 380. The Court will also not permit redactions pertaining to the general description of evidence or anticipated testimony as such redactions are unnecessary to pr
Summary
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC S. DATE FILED: 11 /1 /21 20-CR-330 (AJN) ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: The Court is in receipt of the parties' proposed redactions to the parties' motions in limine, responses in opposition, replies in support, and related exhibits. As the Court indicated at today's conference, some of the parties' proposed redactions are overbroad considering the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). In particular, for the reasons stated at today's conference, the Court denies the Government's request to redact section ten of the Government's motion in limine. See Dkt. No. 380. The Court will also not permit redactions pertaining to the general description of evidence or anticipated testimony as such redactions are unnecessary to pr
Persons Referenced (1)
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Related Documents (6)
EFTA01522145
Court filings: 8
The documents include court filings related to the cases of Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The first filing concerns the scheduling of Maxwell's arraignment and bail hearing, while the second is related to Epstein's bail motion and financial disclosure.
Ghislaine Maxwell — UBS Main Account
Ghislaine Maxwell — UBS Main Account USD Fed Wiring Instructions Bank: UBS AG Bank Address: ABA X: Account Name: Account Number: For Further Credit Client Name: Ghislaine Maxwell For Further Credit Account Number: Notes to sender: All the information in the wiring instructions above must be used for the funds to be credited to the client's account. If needed, please see the below: Swift Address: (If the sending bank requires an 11 digit Swift Address, please use IBAN Alternative: UBS does not have an IBAN for incoming USD wire transfers. As an IBAN alternative, please use the' " account number,' CONFIDENTIAL UBSTERRAMAR00004453 EFTA00239716
EFTA Document EFTA01523575
EFTA01589268
EFTA Document EFTA01519416
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.