Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00078073DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: "-(USANYS)"

From: "-(USANYS)" To: ' (USANYS)" Cc: ' (USANYS)" Subject: RE: Maxwell Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 02:33:31 +0000 Sure, 10 works. From: (USANYS). > Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 10:02 PM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: Re: Maxwell Thanks. Can I call you in the morning? Would 9 or 10 work? I'll keep it quick, I promise. Sent from my iPhone On Jun 16, 2020, at 9:26 PM, (USANYS) a wrote: Sure. Happy to talk now if you'd like, or tomorrow—my schedule is pretty flexible. From: (USANYS) Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 9:22 PM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Maxwell You should talk to them, but if you can give me 30 seconds before hand, I'd appreciate it. From: (USANYS) <a. Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 8:55 PM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Maxwell The team also reached out to me this evening about this. Do you want me to talk to them, you, or both? Happy to speak to either group or both, but if the latter preferably jointly. Thanks. From:

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00078073
Pages
2
Persons
2
Integrity

Summary

From: "-(USANYS)" To: ' (USANYS)" Cc: ' (USANYS)" Subject: RE: Maxwell Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 02:33:31 +0000 Sure, 10 works. From: (USANYS). > Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 10:02 PM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: Re: Maxwell Thanks. Can I call you in the morning? Would 9 or 10 work? I'll keep it quick, I promise. Sent from my iPhone On Jun 16, 2020, at 9:26 PM, (USANYS) a wrote: Sure. Happy to talk now if you'd like, or tomorrow—my schedule is pretty flexible. From: (USANYS) Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 9:22 PM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Maxwell You should talk to them, but if you can give me 30 seconds before hand, I'd appreciate it. From: (USANYS) <a. Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 8:55 PM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Maxwell The team also reached out to me this evening about this. Do you want me to talk to them, you, or both? Happy to speak to either group or both, but if the latter preferably jointly. Thanks. From:

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: "-(USANYS)" To: ' (USANYS)" Cc: ' (USANYS)" Subject: RE: Maxwell Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 02:33:31 +0000 Sure, 10 works. From: (USANYS). > Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 10:02 PM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: Re: Maxwell Thanks. Can I call you in the morning? Would 9 or 10 work? I'll keep it quick, I promise. Sent from my iPhone On Jun 16, 2020, at 9:26 PM, (USANYS) a wrote: Sure. Happy to talk now if you'd like, or tomorrow—my schedule is pretty flexible. From: (USANYS) Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 9:22 PM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Maxwell You should talk to them, but if you can give me 30 seconds before hand, I'd appreciate it. From: (USANYS) <a. Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 8:55 PM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Maxwell The team also reached out to me this evening about this. Do you want me to talk to them, you, or both? Happy to speak to either group or both, but if the latter preferably jointly. Thanks. From: (USANYS) Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2020 8:47 AM To: (USANYS) <a> Cc: (USANYS) Subject: Re: Maxwell Thanks, =. There is some time sensitivity, but it's definitely not an emergency. If the middle or end of next week is better for you, I'm sure that will be fine. EFTA00078073 Sent from my iPhone On Jun 13, 2020, at 12:14 AM, (USANYS) c> wrote: Sure, though early to mid-week may be unpredictable because I've been dragooned into a couple other near-term emergencies ( Is this time-sensitive, too? From: (USANYS) < Sent: Friday, June 12, 2020 3:52 PM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) < Subject: Maxwell Hey — Do you have some time next week to chat briefly about our upcoming indictment of Ghislaine Maxwell? Maxwell, as you may know, was Jeffrey Epstein's former girlfriend and we are charging her for her role in recruiting and grooming minor girls to be abused by Epstein. We are charging her with coercion/Mann Act conspiracy and substantive counts, principally, and have a somewhat complicated question about overt acts that is likely easier to explain by phone. The short version is that both statutes seem to require us to identify a particular state statute the defendant's conduct violated, and where we have victims who were abused — but not in a way that violates a particular state statute — can we still treat them as victims of the conspiracy and allege overt acts with respect to them? To help facilitate this, a current draft of the Indictment is attached. Let us know what might work for you. Thanks so much, EFTA00078074

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01905212

5p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01838551

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, [REDACTED - Survivor], Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
Dept. of JusticeDec 19, 2025

GRAND JURY [EFTA00008998]

GRAND JURY EXHIBIT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. S1 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Entice Minors to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts) The Grand Jury charges: OVERVIEW The char...

1p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01682184

186p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Epstein Reputation Management Email Reveals Paid SEO/Hacking Campaign to Suppress Negative Coverage

The email provides concrete details about a paid operation to manipulate search results for Jeffrey Epstein, including payments, specific tactics, and references to high‑profile associates. It suggest Epstein hired a contractor (Mike) for $2,500 plus a pending $7,500 to run SEO and hacking services. The operation involved removing negative articles, altering Wikipedia, replacing mug‑shot images, a

3p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.