Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00078187DOJ Data Set 9

Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1211 Filed 02/08/21 Page 1 of 5

Other

Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1211 Filed 02/08/21 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Plaintiff, -against- GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP) ORDER LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge: Before the Court is Ms. Maxwell's letter motion (see dkt. no. 1191) seeking limited reconsideration of the Court's order unsealing 20 lines of Ms. Maxwell's July 2016 deposition transcript, from page 112, line 17 through and including page 113, line 12.1 Ms. and non-parties Julie Brown and Miami Herald Media Co oppose the motion.2 For the reasons described below, Ms. Maxwell's motion is denied. I. Legal Standard "A motion for reconsideration is an extraordinary remedy to be employed sparingly in the interests of finality and conservation of scarce judicial resources." Drapkin v. Mafco 1 (Letter from [dkt. no. 1191 Jan. 29, 2021 2 (Letter from 1194]; Letter no. 1195].) Laura Menninger ("Mot."), dated Jan. 25,

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00078187
Pages
5
Persons
3
Integrity
Loading document viewer...

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.