Subject: Information
Subject: Information Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 16:45:22 +0000 Inline-Images: image001.jpg; image002.jpg; image003.jpg; image004.jpg Hello To the extent it is helpful to you, my paralegal clipped the info below about e-mail accounts that may be of relevance to you to the extent you are able to get access to them. Epstein/Maxwell used a Mindspring network to communicate with employees. I also saw in the productions e-mails with the "earthlink" accounts. E stein (email used on behalf of Epstein) Co-Cons irators testimony re Mindspring/Citrix email server Q. What is MindSpring? A. It was a server. I think it was -- the office would have, like. a message system between him, the houses, the employees, his friends. They would write a message on the computer. There was no email at that time. Q. Do you know who set up the mind spring system? A. It was a computer guy. It was a computer guy who worked only for Jeffrey. Mark. Mark Lumber. Q. Was he local to Palm Beach? A. No. He wa
Summary
Subject: Information Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 16:45:22 +0000 Inline-Images: image001.jpg; image002.jpg; image003.jpg; image004.jpg Hello To the extent it is helpful to you, my paralegal clipped the info below about e-mail accounts that may be of relevance to you to the extent you are able to get access to them. Epstein/Maxwell used a Mindspring network to communicate with employees. I also saw in the productions e-mails with the "earthlink" accounts. E stein (email used on behalf of Epstein) Co-Cons irators testimony re Mindspring/Citrix email server Q. What is MindSpring? A. It was a server. I think it was -- the office would have, like. a message system between him, the houses, the employees, his friends. They would write a message on the computer. There was no email at that time. Q. Do you know who set up the mind spring system? A. It was a computer guy. It was a computer guy who worked only for Jeffrey. Mark. Mark Lumber. Q. Was he local to Palm Beach? A. No. He wa
Persons Referenced (3)
“...ee more names to it. Who else would you consider, Ghislaine Maxwell? A. Yes. Sigrid McCawley Partner BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP 401 E. Las Olas Blvd. Suite 1200 Fort La...”
Ghislaine Maxwell“.... Okay. So. we just added three more names to it. Who else would you consider, Ghislaine Maxwell? A. Yes. Sigrid McCawley Partner BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP 401 E. Las Olas Blvd. Suite 1200 For...”
Jeffrey Epstein“...alling the organization. what do you mean by that word? A. People employed by Jeffrey Epstein. There are a few groups of people, his office in New York and I guess -- ***...”
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
www.ostup.comRelated Documents (6)
Case 20-2413. Document 40. 08'20/2020. 2913550, Pagel of 74
Case 20-2413. Document 40. 08'20/2020. 2913550, Pagel of 74 20-2413 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Plaintlff-Appelke, —against— GHISLA1NE MAXWELL, Defendant-Appellant, SHARON CHURCHER, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Respondents, JULIE BROWN, MIAMI HERALD MEDIA COMPANY, ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, MICHAEL CERNOVICH, DBA CERNOVICH MEDIA Intervenors. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 15-CV-7433 (LAP) Ghislaine Maxwell's Opening Brief Ty Gee Adam Mueller HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Den r 2 Tel. Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00075477 Case 20-2413, Document 40, 08/20/2020, 2913550, Page2 of 74 Table of Contents Table of Authorities iii Introduction 1 Jurisdictional Statement 2 Issues Presented 3 Statement of the Case and the Facts 3 The defamation action and the Protective Order 3 The motion to unseal and the first appeal 6 The remand, the arrest,
EFTA00025469
Ca_4ate.24h24/43134.01FrietibtOrtlefifitin0a0le28013,8111$2eafiabef146f 22
Ca_4ate.24h24/43134.01FrietibtOrtlefifitin0a0le28013,8111$2eafiabef146f 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. X 15-cv-07433-LAP Ms. Maxwell's Reply In Support Of Iler Objections to tnsealinu Sealed Materials Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Ty Gee HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue EFTA00074964 Ca_QatIgt24743tictoWneDbtOrfiefiVIMOXIle?BOWERKVaffizte12401 22 Introduction This Court asked the parties to brief three issues: "(a) the weight of presumption of public access that should be afforded to an item, (b) the identification and weight of any countervailing interests supporting continued sealing/redaction of the item, and (c) whether the countervailing interests rebut the presumption of public access to the item." DE 1044 at 1. Plaintiff and the Miami Herald's responses improperly afford the highest level of presumption to discovery dispute documents, deny that any co
Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 92 Filed 04/11/16 Page 1 of 22
DS9 Document EFTA00590749
Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 161 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 4
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.