Case Fileefta-efta00081250DOJ Data Set 9Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-13 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 1 of
Unknown12p4 persons
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-13 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 1 of
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-13 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 1 of 12 EXHIBIT 13 EFTA00081250 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-13 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 2 of 12 .(USAFLS) rom: Jay Lefkowitz pLefkowitz©kirkland.com] nt: Friday September 14 2007 9:40 AM (USAFLS) ubject: Follow up Confidential - thanks very much for speaking this am. Have conferred with my client and I think we are on the same page. When you send me your draft today, would you please also include a paragraph with 403 in lieu of 1512. I want to understand better how you would characterize the 403 violation. (What was actually said?). I want to keep studying that avenue today as well. The other possible option is to charge three 113s. Also, one other idea. Can you look at 47 use 227(b), which is another 6 month statute which might work for the 6 months. We could do three of them, and they seem to fit the facts well. I will call you late this pm (if you leave me a nu
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.