Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00084144DOJ Data Set 9Other

Case 1:19-cv-10788-GHW-DCF Document 1 Filed 11/21/19 Page 1 of 13

Case 1:19-cv-10788-GHW-DCF Document 1 Filed 11/21/19 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Plaintiff, -against- DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, as EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendants. Case No. 19 Civ. 10788 COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND Plaintiff by and through her attorneys, Cuti Hecker Wang LLP and Allred, Maroko & Goldberg, for her Complaint alleges as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION EFTA00084144 Case 1:19-cv-10788-GHW-DCF Document 1 Filed 11/21/19 Page 2 of 13 2 EFTA00084145 Case 1:19-cv-10788-GHW-DCF Document 1 Filed 11/21/19 Page 3 of 13 11. brings this action seeking, at last, some remedy for the egregious abuse that Epstein inflicted when she was a child. PARTIES 12. Plaintiff.] an individual who resides 13. Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn are the Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (the "Estate"). As Executors of the Estate, Defendants are liable for the acts and omi

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00084144
Pages
13
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Case 1:19-cv-10788-GHW-DCF Document 1 Filed 11/21/19 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Plaintiff, -against- DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, as EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendants. Case No. 19 Civ. 10788 COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND Plaintiff by and through her attorneys, Cuti Hecker Wang LLP and Allred, Maroko & Goldberg, for her Complaint alleges as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION EFTA00084144 Case 1:19-cv-10788-GHW-DCF Document 1 Filed 11/21/19 Page 2 of 13 2 EFTA00084145 Case 1:19-cv-10788-GHW-DCF Document 1 Filed 11/21/19 Page 3 of 13 11. brings this action seeking, at last, some remedy for the egregious abuse that Epstein inflicted when she was a child. PARTIES 12. Plaintiff.] an individual who resides 13. Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn are the Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (the "Estate"). As Executors of the Estate, Defendants are liable for the acts and omi

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 1:19-cv-10788-GHW-DCF Document 1 Filed 11/21/19 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Plaintiff, -against- DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, as EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendants. Case No. 19 Civ. 10788 COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND Plaintiff by and through her attorneys, Cuti Hecker Wang LLP and Allred, Maroko & Goldberg, for her Complaint alleges as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION EFTA00084144 Case 1:19-cv-10788-GHW-DCF Document 1 Filed 11/21/19 Page 2 of 13 2 EFTA00084145 Case 1:19-cv-10788-GHW-DCF Document 1 Filed 11/21/19 Page 3 of 13 11. brings this action seeking, at last, some remedy for the egregious abuse that Epstein inflicted when she was a child. PARTIES 12. Plaintiff.] an individual who resides 13. Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn are the Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (the "Estate"). As Executors of the Estate, Defendants are liable for the acts and omissions of Epstein and his agents. For purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1332, Defendants Indyke and Kahn are deemed to be citizens of the United States Virgin Islands, where Epstein was domiciled at the time of his death. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 14. This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because this case is between citizens of different states and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. 15. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2) because a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred in this District. 16. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants. As Executors of the Estate, Defendants Indyke and Kahn are subject to personal jurisdiction in this Court because Epstein was subject to personal jurisdiction at the time of his death. 17. This Court had both specific and general personal jurisdiction over Epstein at the time of his death. 18. Epstein resided in New York State a substantial portion of the time during the time period at issue in this lawsuit, and through the time of his death. 3 EFTA00084146 Case 1:19-cv-10788-GHW-DCF Document 1 Filed 11/21/19 Page 4 of 13 19. Epstein resided in the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York County at the time of his death. 20. Epstein conducted substantial business operations in New York. 21. Epstein owned and/or controlled numerous companies with principal places of business in New York. 22. Epstein owned substantial real property assets in New York, including the townhouse located at 9 East 71st Street in Manhattan, which is valued at $55 million or more. 23. New York was the epicenter of Epstein's criminal sex-trafficking enterprise. For years, Epstein and his agents took actions in New York in order to arrange for minor girls to be trafficked to his homes throughout the country in order to perform sexual acts for him. Epstein's trafficking and abuse of was part of that New York-based criminal enterprise. 24. From his Manhattan townhouse, Epstein directed a vast network of agents in recruiting minor girls to be brought to him for his sexual use. 25. Epstein sexually abused many minor girls, includin in his Manhattan townhouse. 26. On many occasions, Epstein and his agents made phone calls from New York to schedule appointments for minor girls to come to Epstein's residences outside of New York in order to perform commercial sexual acts for Epstein. 27. Upon information and belief, Epstein and/or his agents were present in New York when they took various actions to facilitate the trafficking of for the purpose of performing sexual acts for Epstein. JURY DEMAND 28. Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury on all of her claims in this action. 4 EFTA00084147 Case 1:19-cv-10788-GHW-DCF Document 1 Filed 11/21/19 Page 5 of 13 FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 5 EFTA00084148 Case 1:19-cv-10788-GHW-DCF Document 1 Filed 11/21/19 Page 6 of 13 6 EFTA00084149 Case 1:19-cv-10788-GHW-DCF Document 1 Filed 11/21/19 Page 7 of 13 7 EFTA00084150 Case 1:19-cv-10788-GHW-DCF Document 1 Filed 11/21/19 Page 8 of 13 8 EFTA00084151 Case 1:19-cv-10788-GHW-DCF Document 1 Filed 11/21/19 Page 9 of 13 9 EFTA00084152 Case 1:19-cv-10788-GHW-DCF Document 1 Filed 11/21/19 Page 10 of 13 69. This action is timely under New York law because it falls within New York CPLR 214-g and is brought during the one-year time period set forth in that section. The claims brought herein allege intentional and negligent acts and/or omissions for physical, psychological, and other injury suffered as a result of conduct that would constitute sexual 10 EFTA00084153 Case 1:19-cv-10788-GHW-DCF Document 1 Filed 11/21/19 Page 11 of 13 offenses as defined in Article 130 of the New York Penal Law, and such acts and/or omissions were committed against when she was less than eighteen years of age. 70. Epstein's conduct constitutes "childhood sexual abuse" within the meaning of New Mexico Stat. § 37-1-30 and "abuse" within the meaning of Florida Stat. § 95.11(7). FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION (Battery) 71. Plaintiff hereby incorporates each of the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 72. In committing the acts described above, Epstein intentionally subjected Plaintiff to bodily contact that was offensive in nature. 73. Epstein intentionally touched Plaintiff in a rude, insolent, or angry manner. 74. As a result of Epstein's actions, Plaintiff suffered damages in an amount to be determined at trial. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION (Assault) 75. Plaintiff hereby incorporates each of the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 76. In committing the acts described above, Epstein engaged in physical conduct that placed Plaintiff in imminent apprehension that he would harm her. 77. As a result of Epstein's actions, Plaintiff suffered damages in an amount to be determined at trial. 11 EFTA00084154 Case 1:19-cv-10788-GHW-DCF Document 1 Filed 11/21/19 Page 12 of 13 THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION (Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress) 78. Plaintiff hereby incorporates each of the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. 79. In committing the acts described above, Epstein engaged in extreme and outrageous conduct. 80. In doing so, Epstein acted with the intent to cause and/or disregard of a substantial likelihood of causing Plaintiff to suffer severe emotional distress. 81. As a direct result of Epstein's actions, Plaintiff suffered severe emotional distress. 82. As a result of Epstein's actions, Plaintiff suffered damages in an amount to be determined at trial. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that judgment be entered against Defendants as follows: a. Awarding compensatory damages for all physical injuries, emotional distress, psychological harm, anxiety, humiliation, physical and emotional pain and suffering, family and social disruption, and other harm, in an amount to be determined at trial; b. Awarding punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial; c. Awarding attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to any applicable statute or law; d. Awarding pit- and post-judgment interest on all such damages, fees and/or costs; e. Attaching all of Defendants' real property and other assets located in the State of New York pursuant to New York CPLR 6201 et seq. and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 64; and 1. Awarding such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and proper. 12 EFTA00084155 Case 1:19-cv-10788-GHW-DCF Document 1 Filed 11/21/19 Page 13 of 13 Dated: New York, New York November 21, 2019 CUTI HECKER WANG LLP By: Is/ Mariann Meier Wang Mariann Meier Wang Daniel Mullkoff ALLRED, MAROKO & GOLDBERG Gloria Allred Attorneys for Plaintiff 13 EFTA00084156

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #1:19-CV-10788-GHW

Related Documents (5)

DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00025109

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 1:19-cv-10758-PAE-DCF Document 1 Filed 11/20/19 Page 1 of 19

Case 1:19-cv-10758-PAE-DCF Document 1 Filed 11/20/19 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x MARY DOE, Case No. 19 Civ. 10758 Plaintiff, COMPLAINT -against- AND JURY DEMAND DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, as EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, and Defendants. x Plaintiff Mary Doe', by and through her attorneys, Cuti Hecker Wang LLP and Allred, Maroko & Goldberg, for her Complaint alleges as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. Beginning when Plaintiff Mary Doe was sixteen years old, Jeffrey Epstein preyed upon her, manipulated her to be completely dependent on him, and repeatedly sexually assaulted her. As a result, she attempted suicide multiple times. His degradation of her was total for years. 2. 3. 1. He made clear to Mary how Plaintiff is using the pseudonym "Mary Doe" in this Complaint in place of her real name. "Mary" is not her real first name. Plaintiff intends to file a motion to proceed under a pseudo

19p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01650107

0p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01650107

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Federal Bureau of Investigation

• Federal Bureau of Investigation Victim, Services Division Epstein Briefing RSVP October 15, 2019 - Miami, FL I I October 23, 2019 - New York, NY Please fill out the following form and return to the VictimServiceebi.gov emailbox by October 4, 2019. Full Name: Mariann Meier WangClick here to enter full name Email Address: FOr v uh\r-r, Phone Numbers Social Security Number: Address 1. Address 2: Click here to enter address 2 City:New York State: New York Zip Citizenship: USA Country of Birth: USA If you have spoken with a FBI Victim Specialist, please provide their name: Click here to enter VS name Can you attend? El Yes, I will attend O No, I cannot attend If yes, which location will you attend? D 10/15/2019 Miami, Fl El 10/23/2019 New York, NY You are authorized to bring one support person. Will you be bringing a support person with you to the briefing? O Yes, I will bring one support person X7 No, I will not bring a support person Will you need travel arran

2p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.