Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00085215DOJ Data Set 9Other

Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 50 Filed 04/28/21 Page 1 of 2

Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 50 Filed 04/28/21 Page 1 of 2 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York 86 Chambers Street New York, New York 10007 April 28, 2021 By ECF The Honorable Paul A. Engelmayer United States District Judge Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: The New York Times Co. v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 20 Civ. 833 (PAE) Dear Judge Engelmayer: This Office represents defendant the Federal Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") in this Freedom of Information Act ("FOR"), 5 U.S.C. § 552, action brought by plaintiff the New York Times Company (the "Times") seeking the release of certain records related to Jeffrey Epstein. I write respectfully to seek a two-day extension, from April 30, 2021, to May 4, 2021, to complete the Government's initial production of records for the Court's in camera review, a one-month extension, from April 30, 2021, to May 31, 2021, of the parties' time to submit a sched

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00085215
Pages
2
Persons
2
Integrity

Summary

Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 50 Filed 04/28/21 Page 1 of 2 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York 86 Chambers Street New York, New York 10007 April 28, 2021 By ECF The Honorable Paul A. Engelmayer United States District Judge Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: The New York Times Co. v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 20 Civ. 833 (PAE) Dear Judge Engelmayer: This Office represents defendant the Federal Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") in this Freedom of Information Act ("FOR"), 5 U.S.C. § 552, action brought by plaintiff the New York Times Company (the "Times") seeking the release of certain records related to Jeffrey Epstein. I write respectfully to seek a two-day extension, from April 30, 2021, to May 4, 2021, to complete the Government's initial production of records for the Court's in camera review, a one-month extension, from April 30, 2021, to May 31, 2021, of the parties' time to submit a sched

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 50 Filed 04/28/21 Page 1 of 2 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York 86 Chambers Street New York, New York 10007 April 28, 2021 By ECF The Honorable Paul A. Engelmayer United States District Judge Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: The New York Times Co. v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 20 Civ. 833 (PAE) Dear Judge Engelmayer: This Office represents defendant the Federal Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") in this Freedom of Information Act ("FOR"), 5 U.S.C. § 552, action brought by plaintiff the New York Times Company (the "Times") seeking the release of certain records related to Jeffrey Epstein. I write respectfully to seek a two-day extension, from April 30, 2021, to May 4, 2021, to complete the Government's initial production of records for the Court's in camera review, a one-month extension, from April 30, 2021, to May 31, 2021, of the parties' time to submit a schedule to the Court concerning remaining records, and a one-month extension, from May 14, 2021, to June 14, 2021, of the deadline for the Government to produce remaining documents for in camera review. This is the Government's first request for an extension of the April 30, 2021, and May 14, 2021, deadlines. The Times consents to these requests. The Government has made—and continues to make—substantial efforts to comply with the April 30, 2021, in camera production deadline, but needs two additional business days to finalize the production. The production involves review by multiple prosecution teams and the BOP, as well as a process of combining the results of the various reviews into a single document reflecting redactions on all applicable grounds. While the review processes have been occurring in parallel and some are complete, the government needs some additional to combine, review and finalize the production before submitting it to the Court. The government anticipates it can complete any remaining review and finalize the production by May 4, 2021. The reasons for the Government's request to extend by one month the deadlines to submit a schedule for the production of any remaining documents and to submit such documents is set out in the Government's ex parte and under seal submission filed contemporaneously herewith. I thank the Court for its consideration of this submission. EFTA00085215 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 50 Filed 04/28/21 Page 2 of 2 Page 2 Respectfully submitted, AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney By: /s/ Steven J Kochevar Steven J. Kochevar Assistant United States Attorney 300 Quarropas Street White Plains, NY 10007 Telephone: (914) 993-1928 Email: steven.kochevar@usdoj.gov EFTA00085216

Technical Artifacts (4)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #1:20-CV-00833-PAE
Emailsteven.kochevar@usdoj.gov
Phone(914) 993-1928
Wire Refreflecting

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00028741

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014452

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00031870

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00031532

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: Fw: GHISLAINE MAXWELL CHARGED IN MANHATTAN FEDERAL COURT FOR

Subject: Fw: GHISLAINE MAXWELL CHARGED IN MANHATTAN FEDERAL COURT FOR CONSPIRING WITH JEFFREY EPSTEIN TO SEXUALLY ABUSE MINORS Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2020 15:51:10 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: U.S._v._Ghislaine_Maxwell_Indictment.pdf; Ghislaine_Maxwell_Indictment_PR.pdf Inline-Images: image001.png Hi who should we include for this release in the monthly news bulletin? ublic Affairs Specialist FBI New York Sent: Thursday, July 2, 20201:20 PM Subject: GHISLAINE MAXWELL CHARGED IN MANHATTAN FEDERAL COURT FOR CONSPIRING WITH JEFFREY EPSTEIN TO SEXUALLY ABUSE MINORS UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE Southern District of New York GHISLAINE MAXWELL CHARGED IN MANHATTAN FEDERAL COURT FOR CONSPIRING WITH JEFFREY EPSTEIN TO SEXUALLY ABUSE MINORS Maxwell is Alleged to Have Facilitated, Participated in Acts of Abuse Additionally Charged With Perjury in Connection With 2016 Depositions Audrey Strauss, the Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Will

3p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.