From: '•
From: '• (USANYS)" < To: Sigrid McCawley ctj Cc: ' 11 ci Subject: RE: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AIN) Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 14:00:59 +0000 Understood — thanks very much for letting us know, Sigrid. From: Sigrid McCawley Sent: Tuesday, May 4, 2021 9:18 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: > Subject: RE: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) >; Just as a follow up. I just heard back from and she said her strong preference is as early as possible in the fall — early September would be her preference. and her husband are going through the process of trying to adopt a baby and the birth mother is due in early November (and of course babies can sometimes come a bit earlier). The birth mother has not finalized the match so this is a fluid situation but wants to make sure she is able to be there when the baby is born and of course care for her newborn immediately following the birth. I will keep you updated but strong preference is for as early as po
Summary
From: '• (USANYS)" < To: Sigrid McCawley ctj Cc: ' 11 ci Subject: RE: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AIN) Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 14:00:59 +0000 Understood — thanks very much for letting us know, Sigrid. From: Sigrid McCawley Sent: Tuesday, May 4, 2021 9:18 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: > Subject: RE: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) >; Just as a follow up. I just heard back from and she said her strong preference is as early as possible in the fall — early September would be her preference. and her husband are going through the process of trying to adopt a baby and the birth mother is due in early November (and of course babies can sometimes come a bit earlier). The birth mother has not finalized the match so this is a fluid situation but wants to make sure she is able to be there when the baby is born and of course care for her newborn immediately following the birth. I will keep you updated but strong preference is for as early as po
Persons Referenced (2)
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
www.bsfllp.comRelated Documents (6)
Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 914 Filed 05/11/17 Page 1 of 1
John Alessi deposition
Sigrid S. McCawley Telephone: (954) 356-0011 Email: smccawley@bsfllp.com November 20, 2020 VIA ECF The Honorable Loretta A. Preska District Court Judge United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 15-cv-7433-LAP Dear Judge Preska, Pursuant to the Court’s order dated November 20, 2020 (ECF No. 1157), and in light of Does 1 and 2 not submitting any objection to unsealing within 14 days of being served with their
EFTA00027158
This court order authorizes attorneys Sigrid McCawley and David Boies to bring personal electronic d...
This court order authorizes attorneys Sigrid McCawley and David Boies to bring personal electronic devices and general purpose computing devices into the courthouse for use in the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The order specifies the devices allowed and courtrooms where they can be used. The attorneys are required to comply with the restrictions and obligations set forth in Standing Order M10-468, as Revised.
Maxwell Disputes
Case 18-2868, Document 284, 08/09/2019, 2628244, Page1 of 38 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------X Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. -------------------------------------------------- ............................................. VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, 15-cv-07433-RWS Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiff’s Statement of Contested Facts and Plaintiff’s “Undisputed Facts” Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 56.1 Laura A. M
Deposition Transcript: 533-2
The document is a deposition transcript of G Maxwell, where she is questioned about her involvement with Jeffrey Epstein, including her role in managing contact information and her knowledge of a specific document (Exhibit 13) allegedly stolen from Epstein's house.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.