Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00086970DOJ Data Set 9Other

Subject: FW: Reply brief- Part I

From: To: Subject: FW: Reply brief- Part I Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 21:05:58 +0000 Attachments: Govt_Reply_v3.docx Hi team, Attached is a new version of Part I. There are a couple of comment bubbles I'm hoping you'll check for accuracy, and then you should take a look at the section on MV-4 (p. 11), which I've adjusted in light of my conversation with I talked to about Part II. He said to expect minimal edits, except he thinks we should make the Prior Consistents section a short standalone section. I'm going to draft that now and then circulate. From: Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2021 3:36 PM To: Subject: RE: Reply brief - Part I Team — This is really fantastic. A few minor comments from me and Janis in the attached. From: Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2021 12:06 PM To: Cc: Subject: Reply brief - Part I Hi Attached is a draft of Part I of the reply brief, regarding the issue of pseudonyms. We are editing Part II (of II), which responds to the remaining issues. Than

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00086970
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

From: To: Subject: FW: Reply brief- Part I Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 21:05:58 +0000 Attachments: Govt_Reply_v3.docx Hi team, Attached is a new version of Part I. There are a couple of comment bubbles I'm hoping you'll check for accuracy, and then you should take a look at the section on MV-4 (p. 11), which I've adjusted in light of my conversation with I talked to about Part II. He said to expect minimal edits, except he thinks we should make the Prior Consistents section a short standalone section. I'm going to draft that now and then circulate. From: Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2021 3:36 PM To: Subject: RE: Reply brief - Part I Team — This is really fantastic. A few minor comments from me and Janis in the attached. From: Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2021 12:06 PM To: Cc: Subject: Reply brief - Part I Hi Attached is a draft of Part I of the reply brief, regarding the issue of pseudonyms. We are editing Part II (of II), which responds to the remaining issues. Than

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: Subject: FW: Reply brief- Part I Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 21:05:58 +0000 Attachments: Govt_Reply_v3.docx Hi team, Attached is a new version of Part I. There are a couple of comment bubbles I'm hoping you'll check for accuracy, and then you should take a look at the section on MV-4 (p. 11), which I've adjusted in light of my conversation with I talked to about Part II. He said to expect minimal edits, except he thinks we should make the Prior Consistents section a short standalone section. I'm going to draft that now and then circulate. From: Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2021 3:36 PM To: Subject: RE: Reply brief - Part I Team — This is really fantastic. A few minor comments from me and Janis in the attached. From: Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2021 12:06 PM To: Cc: Subject: Reply brief - Part I Hi Attached is a draft of Part I of the reply brief, regarding the issue of pseudonyms. We are editing Part II (of II), which responds to the remaining issues. Thanks, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York 1 Saint Andrews Plaza New York, New York 10007 EFTA00086970

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.