Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00088741DOJ Data Set 9Other

U.S. Department of Justice

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Si!lo J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 March 22, 2021 BY ECF & ELECTRONIC MAIL The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: In accordance with the Court's March 18, 2021 order (the "Order"), the parties have met and conferred regarding proposed redactions to Exhibit 11 and the defendant's cover letter dated March 9, 2021. The parties have reached an agreement regarding redactions as to Exhibit 11 and the defendant's cover letter. The Government intends to file its omnibus memorandum of law and the corresponding exhibits consistent with the Court's Order, with one exception to which the defense consents. In particular, the defense has indicated that it no longer w

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00088741
Pages
2
Persons
2
Integrity

Summary

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Si!lo J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 March 22, 2021 BY ECF & ELECTRONIC MAIL The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: In accordance with the Court's March 18, 2021 order (the "Order"), the parties have met and conferred regarding proposed redactions to Exhibit 11 and the defendant's cover letter dated March 9, 2021. The parties have reached an agreement regarding redactions as to Exhibit 11 and the defendant's cover letter. The Government intends to file its omnibus memorandum of law and the corresponding exhibits consistent with the Court's Order, with one exception to which the defense consents. In particular, the defense has indicated that it no longer w

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Si!lo J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 March 22, 2021 BY ECF & ELECTRONIC MAIL The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: In accordance with the Court's March 18, 2021 order (the "Order"), the parties have met and conferred regarding proposed redactions to Exhibit 11 and the defendant's cover letter dated March 9, 2021. The parties have reached an agreement regarding redactions as to Exhibit 11 and the defendant's cover letter. The Government intends to file its omnibus memorandum of law and the corresponding exhibits consistent with the Court's Order, with one exception to which the defense consents. In particular, the defense has indicated that it no longer wishes the Government to remove the redactions the Government had originally proposed to pages 118 to 119 of the Government's brief. Those redactions refer to and quote portions of an exhibit filed under seal by the defense and which the Government understands is filed under seal in v. Maxwell, 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP). Accordingly, the Government has kept those redactions in the attached omnibus memorandum of law. Additionally, the Government wishes to note that some portions of the defense's proposed redactions, which the Court adopted in the Order, would redact language that is contained in the publicly-filed Indictment in this case. In particular, the additional redactions proposed by the defendant to pages 129 to 134 on March 9, 2021 relate to language that is quoted in Count Six of the publicly filed Indictment in this case. Although the Government sees no basis under the prevailing case law to redact language that is already publicly available on the docket in this case, the Government is prepared to file the brief with redactions consistent the Order. The Government further notes that the defense also requested earlier today an additional redaction to the bottom of page 134, which is reflected in a red box in the enclosed memorandum. In the interest of expediency and in light of the Court's Order relating to pages 129 to 134, the Government is prepared to file the brief with this additional redaction should the Court so order. The Government again notes, however, that the defendant's new proposal would redact language related to EFTA00088741 Page 2 information that is publicly available in the Indictment that is on the docket in this case. The Government respectfully submits under seal the enclosed version of its memorandum of law with proposed redactions consistent the Court's Order, the redactions originally proposed by the Government and contained on pages 118 to 119, and the additional redaction proposed by the defendant on page 134. Accordingly, the Government respectfully requests that the Court permit the Government to publicly file its memorandum of law with the enclosed proposed redactions. Respectfully submitted, AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney By: Assistant United States Attorneys Southern District of New York Cc: All Counsel of Record (By email) EFTA00088742

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Wire Refreflected

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00031870

0p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 100

The government opposes Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed bail motion, arguing that she remains a flight risk due to the seriousness of the charges, strong evidence against her, and her financial resources and foreign ties. The court had previously denied bail after a thorough hearing, and the government contends that Maxwell's new bail package does not alter the court's prior finding.

36p
Dept. of JusticeDec 19, 2025

GRAND JURY [EFTA00008998]

GRAND JURY EXHIBIT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. S1 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Entice Minors to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts) The Grand Jury charges: OVERVIEW The char...

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

U.S. Department of Justice

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Moll° Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 December 17, 2020 BY FEDERAL EXPRESS MDC—Metropolitan Detention Center Legal Department 80 29th Street Brooklyn, NY 11232 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Enclosed is discovery pertinent to the following inmate: • Ghislaine Maxwell: 02879-509 Please allow her access to the materials enclosed. by: Enclosure Very truly yours, AUDREY STRAUSS Acting United States Attorney Assistant United States Attorneys EFTA00078333

1p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00015186

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00031532

0p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.