Subject: RE: GM -- search warrant returns

From To Cc Subject: RE: GM -- search warrant returns Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 21:34:24 +0000 Inline-Inn ages: image001.jpg Yes, my view is that these would be responsive to 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. And confirmed that these have been de- duped. I'm going to go through and do a few more spot checks to try to weed out any more false hits. My hope is that we can clarify the empty attachments with tomorrow and then ask.o start bates stamping the remaining responsive documents for production tomorrow. Please let me know if you'd like to discuss anything else in the meantime. From: Se To Cc Subject: RE: GM -- search warrant retu Thanks, this is helpful. It seems like th nd jeevacation hits (which had two of the highest hit rates in the STR) would be responsive to #6 (and possibly #2, 3, 4, or 5) - is that right? And have these documents been de-duped? • 1. Evidence concerning the identity or location of the owner(s) or user(s) of the Subject Devices. 2. Evi identity or loca