Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00090110DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: '•

From: '• (USANYS)" To: Sigrid McCawley • Cc: ' " 11 11 ci Subject: RE: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 20:26:47 +0000 Sigrid, Do you have a few minutes to speak tonight or tomorrow? Please let us know when works for you. Thanks, From: Sigrid McCawley Sent: Tuesday, May 4, 20219:18 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: > ica Subject: RE: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) >; Just as a follow up. I just heard back from and she said her strong preference is as early as possible in the fall — early September would be her preference. and her husband are going through the process of trying to adopt a baby and the birth mother is due in early November (and of course babies can sometimes come a bit earlier). The birth mother has not finalized the match so this is a fluid situation but wants to make sure she is able to be there when the baby is born and of course care for her newborn immediately following the birth. I will ke

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00090110
Pages
2
Persons
2
Integrity

Summary

From: '• (USANYS)" To: Sigrid McCawley • Cc: ' " 11 11 ci Subject: RE: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 20:26:47 +0000 Sigrid, Do you have a few minutes to speak tonight or tomorrow? Please let us know when works for you. Thanks, From: Sigrid McCawley Sent: Tuesday, May 4, 20219:18 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: > ica Subject: RE: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) >; Just as a follow up. I just heard back from and she said her strong preference is as early as possible in the fall — early September would be her preference. and her husband are going through the process of trying to adopt a baby and the birth mother is due in early November (and of course babies can sometimes come a bit earlier). The birth mother has not finalized the match so this is a fluid situation but wants to make sure she is able to be there when the baby is born and of course care for her newborn immediately following the birth. I will ke

Persons Referenced (2)

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: '• (USANYS)" To: Sigrid McCawley • Cc: ' " 11 11 ci Subject: RE: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 20:26:47 +0000 Sigrid, Do you have a few minutes to speak tonight or tomorrow? Please let us know when works for you. Thanks, From: Sigrid McCawley Sent: Tuesday, May 4, 20219:18 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: > ica Subject: RE: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) >; Just as a follow up. I just heard back from and she said her strong preference is as early as possible in the fall — early September would be her preference. and her husband are going through the process of trying to adopt a baby and the birth mother is due in early November (and of course babies can sometimes come a bit earlier). The birth mother has not finalized the match so this is a fluid situation but wants to make sure she is able to be there when the baby is born and of course care for her newborn immediately following the birth. I will keep you updated but strong preference is for as early as possible. All my best, Sigrid Sigrid McCawley Partner BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP www.bsfilp.com From: (USANYS) imailto: Sent: Monday, May 3, 20216:34 PM To: Sigrid McCawley Cc: I Subject: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Sigrid, EFTA00090110 Please see the attached order regarding the trial date in this case. We will update you when we have more information. Thanks, Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York The information contained in this electronic message is confidential information intended only for the use of the named recipient(s) and may cents., information that. among other protections, is the subject of attomey.client privilege, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this electronic message is not the named recipient. or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the named recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination. distribution. copying or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and no privilege is waived. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this electronic message and then deleting this electronic message from your computer. (v.1 08201831889 EFTA00090111

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainwww.bsfilp.com

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 914 Filed 05/11/17 Page 1 of 1

1p
Court UnsealedDepositionNov 23, 2020

John Alessi deposition

Sigrid S. McCawley Telephone: (954) 356-0011 Email: smccawley@bsfllp.com November 20, 2020 VIA ECF The Honorable Loretta A. Preska District Court Judge United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 15-cv-7433-LAP Dear Judge Preska, Pursuant to the Court’s order dated November 20, 2020 (ECF No. 1157), and in light of Does 1 and 2 not submitting any objection to unsealing within 14 days of being served with their

17p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00027158

0p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

This court order authorizes attorneys Sigrid McCawley and David Boies to bring personal electronic d...

This court order authorizes attorneys Sigrid McCawley and David Boies to bring personal electronic devices and general purpose computing devices into the courthouse for use in the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The order specifies the devices allowed and courtrooms where they can be used. The attorneys are required to comply with the restrictions and obligations set forth in Standing Order M10-468, as Revised.

1p
Court UnsealedAug 9, 2019

Maxwell Disputes

Case 18-2868, Document 284, 08/09/2019, 2628244, Page1 of 38 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------X Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. -------------------------------------------------- ............................................. VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, 15-cv-07433-RWS Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiff’s Statement of Contested Facts and Plaintiff’s “Undisputed Facts” Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 56.1 Laura A. M

38p
Court UnsealedDepositionUnknown

Deposition Transcript: 533-2

The document is a deposition transcript of G Maxwell, where she is questioned about her involvement with Jeffrey Epstein, including her role in managing contact information and her knowledge of a specific document (Exhibit 13) allegedly stolen from Epstein's house.

18p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.