(USANYS)"
From: (USANYS)" To: (USANYS)" alMIE> Cc: (USANYS) [Contractor]" <=1=IMIE> Subject: Re: Andrew Statement Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 17:08:17 +0000 Thanks. Let's see whatMistributed and then discuss. > On Jun 8, 2020, at 12:53 PM, (USANYS) alMIN> wrote: > Since time is of the essence and I'm sure will have a lot to add, here is a quick draft. Would you like for me too loop them in as well? > Earlier today, a statement was issued by the UK law firm of Blackfords LLP on behalf of their client, Prince Andrew, regarding the communications between this Office and Andrew's counsel to interview their client. Blackfords' statement contains several false assertions regarding those discussions. Firstly, their statement claims that they were "given an unequivocal assurance that the discussions would remain confidential," which is false. The statement also falsely claims that this Office somehow communicated that the Duke is not a `target' of any criminal investigation into the condu
Summary
From: (USANYS)" To: (USANYS)" alMIE> Cc: (USANYS) [Contractor]" <=1=IMIE> Subject: Re: Andrew Statement Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 17:08:17 +0000 Thanks. Let's see whatMistributed and then discuss. > On Jun 8, 2020, at 12:53 PM, (USANYS) alMIN> wrote: > Since time is of the essence and I'm sure will have a lot to add, here is a quick draft. Would you like for me too loop them in as well? > Earlier today, a statement was issued by the UK law firm of Blackfords LLP on behalf of their client, Prince Andrew, regarding the communications between this Office and Andrew's counsel to interview their client. Blackfords' statement contains several false assertions regarding those discussions. Firstly, their statement claims that they were "given an unequivocal assurance that the discussions would remain confidential," which is false. The statement also falsely claims that this Office somehow communicated that the Duke is not a `target' of any criminal investigation into the condu
Persons Referenced (1)
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
referencedRelated Documents (6)
EFTA Document EFTA01364228
Alleged testimony that Jeffrey Epstein paid a 17‑year‑old $15k to have sex with Prince Andrew and flew other young women for similar encounters
The passage links Jeffrey Epstein to a claim that a witness was paid $15,000 to have sex with Prince Andrew at age 17 and mentions additional flights of young women for sexual purposes. It provides sp Witness alleges she was flown to London by Epstein and paid $15k to have sex with Prince Andrew at a Epstein allegedly arranged flights for other young women for sexual encounters Bradley Edwards is
EFTA01682184
EFTA Document EFTA01297934
"Darren Indyke" AND allegation OR arrest OR bribe OR convict OR corrupt OR court O... Page 1 of 2 Goggle *Clew IndyMC AND elligetton OR east OR bribe OR convict CR corrupt OR O All News 'arcs I,na9pn Maps Mtn - con /}n' ,y-. 12 resettle :0 2 roorde; Exclusive: New York attorney general seeks information on financier ... vAwr refort.CCWAIrtele2CISC0MtnagnIcinl.:^areynUSKBN0M2D0V2C15DXS Mos . North Korea Cnannes &Kew ror.ed Epstein's Lawyer Darren Indyke to cup*n why Easter(' foun
Anecdotal recollections linking Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew, and high‑profile financiers
The passage offers personal impressions and vague connections but provides no concrete evidence, dates, transactions, or actionable leads. It mentions well‑known figures, but only in a speculative, go Author claims to have met Epstein and Maxwell at parties and describes their behavior. Mentions Prince Andrew walking with Epstein and suggests a possible business‑related motive. References financie
EFTA01837146
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.