Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00093698DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: Elkan Abramowitz / Jonathan Sack

From: Elkan Abramowitz / Jonathan Sack To: Subject: Limiting Victims' Rights: The Eleventh Circuit Reads the CVRA Narrowly Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 17:32:52 +0000 VJ EFTA00093698 May 28, 2020 New York Law Journal by Elkan Abramowitz, Jonathan S. Sack Limiting Victims' Rights: The Eleventh Circuit Reads the CVRA Narrowly Dear Friends and Colleagues, The life, and death, of Jeffrey Epstein has captured the attention of the legal community and broader public. The latest legal twist in the story is a decision by the Eleventh Circuit in In re Wild, 955 F.3d 1196 (11th Cir. 2020), which held that federal prosecutors did not have an obligation to inform, and consult with, Epstein's victims regarding their decision not to prosecute Epstein for sex trafficking. In our latest New York Law Journal article, "Limiting Victims' Rights: The Eleventh Circuit Reads the CVRA Narrowly," we summarize the federal Crime Victims' Rights Act and discuss the majority, concurring and dissenti

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00093698
Pages
2
Persons
1
Integrity

Summary

From: Elkan Abramowitz / Jonathan Sack To: Subject: Limiting Victims' Rights: The Eleventh Circuit Reads the CVRA Narrowly Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 17:32:52 +0000 VJ EFTA00093698 May 28, 2020 New York Law Journal by Elkan Abramowitz, Jonathan S. Sack Limiting Victims' Rights: The Eleventh Circuit Reads the CVRA Narrowly Dear Friends and Colleagues, The life, and death, of Jeffrey Epstein has captured the attention of the legal community and broader public. The latest legal twist in the story is a decision by the Eleventh Circuit in In re Wild, 955 F.3d 1196 (11th Cir. 2020), which held that federal prosecutors did not have an obligation to inform, and consult with, Epstein's victims regarding their decision not to prosecute Epstein for sex trafficking. In our latest New York Law Journal article, "Limiting Victims' Rights: The Eleventh Circuit Reads the CVRA Narrowly," we summarize the federal Crime Victims' Rights Act and discuss the majority, concurring and dissenti

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Elkan Abramowitz / Jonathan Sack To: Subject: Limiting Victims' Rights: The Eleventh Circuit Reads the CVRA Narrowly Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 17:32:52 +0000 VJ EFTA00093698 May 28, 2020 New York Law Journal by Elkan Abramowitz, Jonathan S. Sack Limiting Victims' Rights: The Eleventh Circuit Reads the CVRA Narrowly Dear Friends and Colleagues, The life, and death, of Jeffrey Epstein has captured the attention of the legal community and broader public. The latest legal twist in the story is a decision by the Eleventh Circuit in In re Wild, 955 F.3d 1196 (11th Cir. 2020), which held that federal prosecutors did not have an obligation to inform, and consult with, Epstein's victims regarding their decision not to prosecute Epstein for sex trafficking. In our latest New York Law Journal article, "Limiting Victims' Rights: The Eleventh Circuit Reads the CVRA Narrowly," we summarize the federal Crime Victims' Rights Act and discuss the majority, concurring and dissenting opinions of the divided Eleventh Circuit. We hope you are all staying healthy and safe. Best Regards, Elkan Abramowitz and Jonathan Sack A VIEW FULL ARTICLE Elkan Abramowitz Morvillo Abramowitz Grand Iason & Anello PC 565 Fifth Avenue New York. New York 10017 Jonathan S. Sack Morvillo Abramowitz Grand Iason & Anello PC 565 Fifth Avenue New York. New York 10017 For more articles, please visit maglaw.com/publications A CONTACT US Copyright © 2020 All Rights Reserved. This communication may contain attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Privacy Policy I Unsubscribe EFTA00093699

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainmaglaw.com

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.