Case Fileefta-efta00094822DOJ Data Set 9Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests
Unknown4p1 persons
Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests
Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2020 13:31:23 +0000 I defer to you two on tone. One nit-the letter switches between DOJ and Department. I think Department is the more formal. On Jan 3, 2020, at 8:49 PM, wrote: Thanks very much for drafting this, and I think generally it looks great. My only small thought would near the end, in the penultimate paragraph, where I'd suggest replacing the first two sentences with (something like): "My understanding is that you may intend to make a formal written request pursuant to the above-described regulations. [If you choose to submit .. .]" I say that only because the current language makes it sound like they were supposed to submit something in writing, or that they otherwise erred, when in fact what they actually asked for was just an explanation of the appropriate form in which to make a formal request-which they can do consistent with the regulations set forth in the letter. Does that sound alrig
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.