Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00095654DOJ Data Set 9Other

GG COHEN & GRESSER LLP

GG COHEN & GRESSER LLP 1100 Thud twenue New York NY 10022 Mark S. Cohen Christian R. Eveniell +1 1212 957-7600 January 25, 2021 VIA ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) www.00hengeSSer.COM Dear Judge Nathan: On behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell, we will be filing the following pretrial motions with accompanying exhibits: I. Motion to Dismiss the Superseding Indictment for Breach of the Non-Prosecution Agreement 2. Motion to Dismiss Counts One through Four of the Superseding Indictment as Time- Barred 3. Motion Under the Due Process Clause to Suppress All Evidence Obtained from the Government's Subpoena to and to Dismiss Counts Five and Six 4. Motion to Dismiss Counts Five and Six of the Superseding Indictment Because the Alleged Misstatements Are Not Penurious as a Matter of Law 5. Motion for a Severan

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00095654
Pages
2
Persons
2
Integrity

Summary

GG COHEN & GRESSER LLP 1100 Thud twenue New York NY 10022 Mark S. Cohen Christian R. Eveniell +1 1212 957-7600 January 25, 2021 VIA ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) www.00hengeSSer.COM Dear Judge Nathan: On behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell, we will be filing the following pretrial motions with accompanying exhibits: I. Motion to Dismiss the Superseding Indictment for Breach of the Non-Prosecution Agreement 2. Motion to Dismiss Counts One through Four of the Superseding Indictment as Time- Barred 3. Motion Under the Due Process Clause to Suppress All Evidence Obtained from the Government's Subpoena to and to Dismiss Counts Five and Six 4. Motion to Dismiss Counts Five and Six of the Superseding Indictment Because the Alleged Misstatements Are Not Penurious as a Matter of Law 5. Motion for a Severan

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
GG COHEN & GRESSER LLP 1100 Thud twenue New York NY 10022 Mark S. Cohen Christian R. Eveniell +1 1212 957-7600 January 25, 2021 VIA ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) www.00hengeSSer.COM Dear Judge Nathan: On behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell, we will be filing the following pretrial motions with accompanying exhibits: I. Motion to Dismiss the Superseding Indictment for Breach of the Non-Prosecution Agreement 2. Motion to Dismiss Counts One through Four of the Superseding Indictment as Time- Barred 3. Motion Under the Due Process Clause to Suppress All Evidence Obtained from the Government's Subpoena to and to Dismiss Counts Five and Six 4. Motion to Dismiss Counts Five and Six of the Superseding Indictment Because the Alleged Misstatements Are Not Penurious as a Matter of Law 5. Motion for a Severance of and Separate Trial on Counts Five and Six of the Superseding Indictment 6. Motion to Strike Surplusage from the Superseding Indictment 7. Motion to Dismiss Counts One Through Six of the Superseding Indictment for Pre- Indictment Delay 8. Motion to Dismiss Either Count One or Count Three of the Superseding Indictment as Multiplicitous 9. Motion to Dismiss the Superseding Indictment as It Was Obtained in Violation of the Sixth Amendment 10. Motion for a Bill of Particulars and Pretrial Disclosures II. Motion Under the Fourth Amendment, Martindell, and the Fifth Amendment to Suppress All Evidence Obtained from the Government's Subpoena to and to Dismiss Counts Five and Six 12. Motion to Dismiss Counts One through Four of the Superseding Indictment for Lack of Specificity EFTA00095654 The Honorable Alison J. Nathan January 25, 2021 Page 2 Several of the motions reference or discuss Confidential Information produced in discovery and are therefore redacted pursuant to paragraph 15 of the Protective Order (Dkt. 36). In an abundance of caution, and to give the government the chance to review the proposed redactions, we will not file on the public docket any motions containing redactions until we are instructed to do so by the Court. Instead, we will submit by email to the Court and the government two versions of those motions—an unredacted original to be kept under seal and a version for public filing with proposed redactions-pursuant to Rule 2(B) of the Court's individual rules of criminal practice. We will file on the public docket any motions that do not contain redactions. Please contact us with any questions. Your consideration is greatly appreciated. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Mark S. Cohen Mark S. Cohen Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Avenue, 21st Floor New York New York 10022 cc: All counsel of record (via email) EFTA00095655

Technical Artifacts (3)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainwww.00hengesser.com
Phone+1 1212 957-7600
Wire Refreference

Related Documents (6)

House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

Defense attorney Christian R. Everdell requests that the court order the MDC to accept two hard driv...

Defense attorney Christian R. Everdell requests that the court order the MDC to accept two hard drives containing non-Highly Confidential discovery materials for Ghislaine Maxwell's use. The hard drives are organized in a user-friendly format, and the government does not object to the request. The MDC Legal Department has expressed concerns and is given the opportunity to note objections.

1p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Declaration in Support of Motion to Withdraw as Co-Counsel: 798-1

Christian R. Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP declares that the firm is withdrawing as co-counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell with her consent, as Markus Moss PLLC has taken over her representation for the government's motion to unseal grand jury transcripts. Cohen & Gresser LLP represented Maxwell during her trial and sentencing but not in her appellate proceedings. The firm will share its files with Markus Moss PLLC upon request.

2p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00019897

0p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 133

Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team files a motion to suppress evidence obtained from a government subpoena and to dismiss Counts Five and Six of the indictment, citing the Due Process Clause. The motion is supported by a memorandum of law and exhibits. The defense attorneys representing Maxwell are listed, along with their contact information.

2p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court filings: 8

The documents include court filings related to the cases of Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The first filing concerns the scheduling of Maxwell's arraignment and bail hearing, while the second is related to Epstein's bail motion and financial disclosure.

4p
Court UnsealedCorrespondenceUnknown

Court Filing - Letter to Judge: Case1:20-cr-03320-AJN Document 292 Filed 08/27/20 Page 20 of 1164

The defense attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell request a protective order from Judge Alison J. Nathan to govern the handling of discovery materials. The parties have reached agreement on most provisions but remain at odds over restrictions on government witnesses and the disclosure of alleged victim identities.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.