Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00095829DOJ Data Set 9Other

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC 0: DATE. FILED: 11 /11/21 20-CR-330 (MN) ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: The Court is in receipt of the parties' proposed redactions in accordance with Dkt. No. 401. The Court concludes that the proposed redactions and requests to seal certain exhibits are consistent with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) and narrowly tailored to protect the pre-trial privacy interests of alleged victims, anticipated witnesses, and non-parties. See United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1050-51 (2d Cir. 1995). The parties are hereby ORDERED to file the proposed redactions and accompanying exhibits on the public docket on or before November 12, 2021. SO ORDERED. Dated: November 11, 2021 New York, New York 1 ALISON J. NATHAN

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00095829
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity

Summary

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC 0: DATE. FILED: 11 /11/21 20-CR-330 (MN) ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: The Court is in receipt of the parties' proposed redactions in accordance with Dkt. No. 401. The Court concludes that the proposed redactions and requests to seal certain exhibits are consistent with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) and narrowly tailored to protect the pre-trial privacy interests of alleged victims, anticipated witnesses, and non-parties. See United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1050-51 (2d Cir. 1995). The parties are hereby ORDERED to file the proposed redactions and accompanying exhibits on the public docket on or before November 12, 2021. SO ORDERED. Dated: November 11, 2021 New York, New York 1 ALISON J. NATHAN

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC 0: DATE. FILED: 11 /11/21 20-CR-330 (MN) ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: The Court is in receipt of the parties' proposed redactions in accordance with Dkt. No. 401. The Court concludes that the proposed redactions and requests to seal certain exhibits are consistent with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) and narrowly tailored to protect the pre-trial privacy interests of alleged victims, anticipated witnesses, and non-parties. See United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1050-51 (2d Cir. 1995). The parties are hereby ORDERED to file the proposed redactions and accompanying exhibits on the public docket on or before November 12, 2021. SO ORDERED. Dated: November 11, 2021 New York, New York 1 ALISON J. NATHAN United States District Judge EFTA00095829

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.