Subject: RE: OPR
From: To: Cc: Subject: RE: OPR Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 19:59:53 +0000 Got it, thanks. I'll just plan to note in the cover letter that the report is publicly available, but we are producing a copy to the defense as a courtesy. From: Sent: Monday, February 1, 20212:58 PM To: Cc: Subject: RE: OPR Sorry for the multiple emails, but one final point on this — OPR is asking that we not affirmatively accuse Congress of leaking/releasing the report but simply say that it is publicly available or the press has gotten a copy or something like that. Happy to review the cover letter if that would be helpful. From: Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 2:08 PM To: Cc: Subject: RE: OPR Makes sense, thanks. From: Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 2:07 PM To: >; Cc: Subject: RE: OPR I think that's fine, although I would definitely note in producing it that you are doing so as a courtesy since it is widely available and has been since November 2020, so they can't argue we sandbagged the
Summary
From: To: Cc: Subject: RE: OPR Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 19:59:53 +0000 Got it, thanks. I'll just plan to note in the cover letter that the report is publicly available, but we are producing a copy to the defense as a courtesy. From: Sent: Monday, February 1, 20212:58 PM To: Cc: Subject: RE: OPR Sorry for the multiple emails, but one final point on this — OPR is asking that we not affirmatively accuse Congress of leaking/releasing the report but simply say that it is publicly available or the press has gotten a copy or something like that. Happy to review the cover letter if that would be helpful. From: Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 2:08 PM To: Cc: Subject: RE: OPR Makes sense, thanks. From: Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 2:07 PM To: >; Cc: Subject: RE: OPR I think that's fine, although I would definitely note in producing it that you are doing so as a courtesy since it is widely available and has been since November 2020, so they can't argue we sandbagged the
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (6)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
45130377327894https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/justice-department-review-jeffreyspstein/41cla927e0acff76/full.pdfhttps://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7327894-DOJ-Epstein-Report.html?sidebar=falsehttps://www.scribd.comidocument/484513037/Dept-of-Justice-Jeffrey-Epstein-Plea-Deal-Investigationhttps://www.washingtonpost.com/context/read-the-report-investigation-into-the-u-s-attorney-s-office-for-the-southernRelated Documents (6)
EFTA01682184
EFTA01370863
Medical Record/Clinical Encounter: DOJ-OGR-00026334
This clinical encounter document from the Bureau of Prisons details a medical evaluation of Jeffrey Epstein on July 12, 2019. It covers his medical history, current complaints, and treatment, including discussions around his triglyceride levels, sleep apnea, and back pain. The document was generated by the treating physician at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York.
EFTA00014087
EFTA02367961
EFTA01977826
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.