Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00101307DOJ Data Set 9Other

PROFFER AGREEMENT

PROFFER AGREEMENT With respect to the meeting of H.R.H. Prince Andrew Albert Christian Edward, the Duke of York, also known as Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor "Client" and his attorney Gar , x Esq., with Assistant United States Attorneys and to be held at the Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York on ("the meeting"), the following understandings exist: (1) THIS IS NOT A COOPERATION AGREEMENT. The Client has agreed to provide the Government with information, and to respond to questions, so that the Government may evaluate Client's information and responses in making prosecutive decisions. By receiving Client's proffer, the Government does not agree to make a motion on the Client's behalf or to enter into a cooperation agreement, plea agreement, immunity or non-prosecution agreement. The Government makes no representation about the likelihood that any such agreement will be reached in connection with this proffer. (2) In any prosecution brou

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00101307
Pages
2
Persons
2
Integrity

Summary

PROFFER AGREEMENT With respect to the meeting of H.R.H. Prince Andrew Albert Christian Edward, the Duke of York, also known as Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor "Client" and his attorney Gar , x Esq., with Assistant United States Attorneys and to be held at the Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York on ("the meeting"), the following understandings exist: (1) THIS IS NOT A COOPERATION AGREEMENT. The Client has agreed to provide the Government with information, and to respond to questions, so that the Government may evaluate Client's information and responses in making prosecutive decisions. By receiving Client's proffer, the Government does not agree to make a motion on the Client's behalf or to enter into a cooperation agreement, plea agreement, immunity or non-prosecution agreement. The Government makes no representation about the likelihood that any such agreement will be reached in connection with this proffer. (2) In any prosecution brou

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
PROFFER AGREEMENT With respect to the meeting of H.R.H. Prince Andrew Albert Christian Edward, the Duke of York, also known as Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor "Client" and his attorney Gar , x Esq., with Assistant United States Attorneys and to be held at the Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York on ("the meeting"), the following understandings exist: (1) THIS IS NOT A COOPERATION AGREEMENT. The Client has agreed to provide the Government with information, and to respond to questions, so that the Government may evaluate Client's information and responses in making prosecutive decisions. By receiving Client's proffer, the Government does not agree to make a motion on the Client's behalf or to enter into a cooperation agreement, plea agreement, immunity or non-prosecution agreement. The Government makes no representation about the likelihood that any such agreement will be reached in connection with this proffer. (2) In any prosecution brought against Client by this Office, except as provided below the Government will not offer in evidence on its case-in-chief, or in connection with any sentencing proceeding for the purpose of determining an appropriate sentence, any statements made by Client at the meeting, except (a) in a prosecution for false statements, obstruction of justice or perjury with respect to any acts committed or statements made during or after the meeting or testimony given after the meeting; or (b) if, at any time following the meeting, Client becomes a fugitive from justice. (3) Notwithstanding item (2) above: (a) the Government may use information derived directly or indirectly from the meeting for the purpose of obtaining leads to other evidence, which evidence may be used in any prosecution of Client by the Government; (b) in any prosecution brought against Client, the Government may use statements made by Client at the meeting and all evidence obtained directly or indirectly therefrom for the purpose of cross-examination should Client testify; and (c) the Government may also use statements made by Client at the meeting to rebut any evidence or arguments offered by or on behalf of Client (including arguments made or issues raised sua sponte by the District Court) at any stage of the criminal prosecution (including bail, all phases of trial, and sentencing) in any prosecution brought against Client. (4) The Client understands and agrees that in the event the Client seeks to qualify for a reduction in sentence under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3553(f), United States Sentencing Guidelines, Sections 2D1.1(b)(18) or 5C1.2, or Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b), the Office may offer or use at any stage of the criminal proceeding any statement made by Client during the meeting, and all evidence obtained directly or indirectly therefrom, to the extent such use is consistent with Section 402 of the First Step Act of 2018. (5) To the extent that the Government is entitled under this Agreement to offer in evidence any statements made by Client or leads obtained therefrom, Client shall assert no claim under the United States Constitution, any statute, Rule 410 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, or any other 01.14.2019 EFTA00101307 federal rule that such statements or any leads therefrom should be suppressed. It is the intent of this Agreement to waive all rights in the foregoing respects. (6) If this Office receives a request from another prosecutor's office for access to information obtained pursuant to this Proffer Agreement, this Office may furnish such information but will do so only on the condition that the requesting office honor the provisions of this Agreement. (7) It is further understood that this Agreement is limited to the statements made by Client at the meeting and does not apply to any oral, written or recorded statements made by Client at any other time. No understandings, promises, agreements and/or conditions have been entered into with respect to the meeting other than those set forth in this Agreement and none will be entered into unless in writing and signed by all parties. (8) The understandings set forth in paragraphs 1 through 7 above extend to the continuation of this meeting on the dates that appear below. (9) Client and Attorney acknowledge that they have fully discussed and understand every paragraph and clause in this Agreement and the consequences thereof. Dated: New York, New York AUDREY STRAUSS Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York by: Client Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Client Witness Dates of Continuation Initials of counsel, Client, Al:SA, witness 01.14.2019 EFTA00101308

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

AMC-RICA - AUSTRALIA

AMC-RICA - AUSTRALIA 5/19r22. 3:52 PM Pk% CO; - CO \ZAN 1.1C-Ni P 0.C57 - 'N ARV) Jeffrey Epstein - Wikipedia Epstein a massage". She claims she was taken to his mansion, Perversion of Justice, Miami Herald, where he exposed himcelf and had sexual intercourse with November 30, 2018. her, and paid her $200 immediately afterward. lob A similar $50-million suit was filed in March 2008, by a dif₹erent woman, who was represented by the same lawier.Q.91These and several similar lawsuits were clismissed.a321 All other lawsuits have been settled by Epstein out of comt.1-1311 Epstein made many out-of-court settlements with alleged victims.[491 Victims' rights: Jane Does v. United States (2014) 564) L. tqek:SC at PZ:e. pReA-01.)e•ii PrcissincisL4 A December 3o, 2O14, federal civil suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doe l) and Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act by the U.S.. Department Of Justice's NpA with Ante; Ti and his li

51p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01398943

Nicoletti Customer Number Customer Name Exempt Reason Alpern, Jerome Adam J. Goodman Andrea Nicoletti L. Weicker 1950 Trust FBO T. Weicker ea Nicoletti ea Nicoletti etti Type * High Risk * Moderate Risk Exemption Reason Customer Owner Client N Y 5/3/2017 Lifetime Revocable Trust Client L P Weicker Est L P Weicker Jr Etal Tr Joan M Kettenmann Trust Client N Limestone Partners Client Y BRENT, AVERIL R Client N Bailey, Lilly Beecher Client N Wang, Shu Fang Client N Marty

5p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01398793

Subject: RE: MD approval for ACUs completed for High Risk Clients [I] From: Andrew Gallivan Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 To: Vaishali-P Mehta < Classification: For internal use only Approved. From: Vaishali-P Mehta Sent: Friday, April 07, 2017 2:21 PM To: Andrew Gallivan Subject: FW: MD approval for ACUs completed for High Risk Clients [I] Classification: For internal use only Hi Andrew, In an effort to ensure that you have to approve only 1 email, I sent the below email, in hindsight I s

43p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01428714

Subject: RE: MD approval for ACUs completed for High Risk Clients [I] From: Vaishali-P Mehta Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 13:16:38 -0400 To: Joanne Jensen Andrew Gallivan Cc: Mark Gonzalez Rachel Maglicic Stewart Oldfield Brian P Conve Jennifer Shay Andrea Nicoletti Rosemary Vrablic Mary A Coleman Terrence F Tan Terri Sohra Classification: For internal use only Hi Joanne I fully understand. Thankfully this is the last of the emails as going forward we will have KYC updates which wil

44p
Court UnsealedNov 19, 2025

HOUSE OVERSIGHT 016696-Royal-Hammon

November 12, 2025 release of Jeffrey Epstein documents by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Microsoft Excel Spreadsheets converted to PDF. Originals in NATIVES/001 folder

14p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01382234

Vernon E. Jordan, Jr. Revocable Trust Andrew Gallivan 3/7/2017 Mr. Jordan is a Partner at the law firm of Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld. He is also a Senior Managing Director at Lazard Freres. Mr. Jordan also remains a director on a number of corporate boards including American Express, J.C. Penney Corporation, Xerox, Asbury Automotive Group and the Dow Jones & Company. He is formerly a member of the board of directors of Revlon, Sara Lee, Corning and RJR Nabis

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.