Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Cc: '
I)" <I
Great. Thank you for the quick turnaround!
On Jan 7, 2021, at 7:19 PM,
No issues from the Tartaglione team. Thanks,
wrote:
From:
To:
Cc:
For Tartaglione there are not, but there are records showing Epstein attorney visits in there.
On Jan 7, 2021, at 7:05 PM,
Hey •
here?
From:
To:
> wrote:
— I will look now, but first, can you confirm there are no visit logs or count slops reflecting attorney visits in
Before greenlighting the Epstein FOIA production tomorrow, I wanted to make sure that you were okay with the 26
pages BOP sent yesterday (attached) from the Tartaglione perspective. I think the only mentions of Tartaglione are on
the last two pages, where his name is on a SHU roster and redacted. I assume no issues from the Tartoglione team, but
please let me know. Thanks and sorry for the tight turnaround here.
Thanks,
From:
To:
Cc:
1.S
All,
Following up on the below: for some reason
>;
EFTA00102012
I've saved these in the shared drive at the links below. (
please note that I segregated in separate folders the attorney and social visit log pages in the production
version and the attorney and social visit log pages and the count slips in the translucent version--no count slips in the
production version because they are withheld in full.)
Please let me know if you have any issues with these new pages, or with the production version (which, to be clear,
should just be the pages in the translucent version that are not withheld in full, with the green no longer translucent).
This has to be produced by Friday so, if possible, please let me know of any questions or concerns by eod tomorrow
(Thursday).
Thanks, all,
From:
To:
Cc:
)
>
>;
All,
FYI, it now looks like there may be approximately
as
translucent pages for review (they sent a final count of pages that does not line up with what we have). I am following
up with them
on short notice before the production on Friday. I will follow up once I have more
information from BOP about the discrepancies here.
).
but now are
redacted to show Epstein's name (similar to the census roster discussion below). Please let me know if you have any
concerns.
Thanks,
From:
To:
Cc:
) 4
)
>
›;
cza
I agree with
and feel free to call me if you want to talk through these,
From:
To:
Cc:
) 4
>;
>;
EFTA00102013
Thanks,
My understanding on that point was that the
Also, I want to flag a point I meant to raise before. In the earlier round,
"—it starts at the end
of the Part 2 file and continues into the Part 3 file). This does not make a big practical difference because
discuss more.
Thanks,
From:
To:
Cc:
Please let me know if you have any concerns on this point, or if we need to
>.;
>;
I've taken a look. All looks fine, subject to one question for whoever is best positioned to answe
other places we appear to have confined our redactions to
files differently?
From:
(USANYS)
To:
Cc:
In
Why are we treating these two
Sounds good, thanks. I should be able to review all by tomorrow.
From:
To:
Cc:
>;
>;
That's right. Your declaration
>;
The exception to this area
EFTA00102014
Thanks,
From:
To:
Cc:
) a
'.;
S;
Thanks,
. Just so I understand — the redactions in the documents themselves are marked b6 and b7c. I am only
attesting to b7a redactions, right? I could be wrong, but not everything that is marked green, I think, requires a 7a
redaction as opposed to for a privacy reason.
From:
To:
Cc:
)
>;
Happy New Year. I'm following up on the Epstein FOIA and the plan we put together last month. BOP has completed its
review of the documents provid
he
final production date is this Friday, 01/08. Your declaration supportin
is due next Friday, 01/15.
In advance of this Friday's production, we wanted to make sure you are okay with
As before, the green transculent coloring on the documents shows where redactions will be made (and a page will be
withheld in full if the whole page is green)
but given the timing I wanted to go ahead
and provide you with the files,
In addition to what's already marked green,
fOM
will
update the docs in the folder and let you know. Please let us know if you have any concerns about the withholdings or
any questions.
Thanks,
From:
To:
Cc:
>;
>
EFTA00102015
Hi
— no problem, I can do it, and those dates should work for me.
From:
To:
Cc:
I hope you're doing well. I'm writing to check in on the Epstein FOIA case, Times v. BOP, 20-cv-833. By way of a brief
reca p
Please let me know if this proposed schedule works, or if you have any questions or concerns. I'm happy to discuss on
a call if helpful.
Thanks,
Assistant United States Attorney
86 Chambers Street, Third Floor
New York, NY 10007
EFTA00102016