Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00102162DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: '

From: ' To:' Cc: ' )" (USANYS)" < )" Subject: Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 02:38:21 -4)000 Makes sense, thanks. On May 9, 2021, at 10:12 PM, (USANYS) < > wrote: I can just refer her back to the defense letter on April 22, 2021 filed on the docket requesting a continuance to November 8, 2021 unless there is something else you have in mind. From: Sigrid McCawley c Sent: Saturday, May 8, 2021 7:35 AM To: (USANYS) < Cc: Subject: RE: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Hello -that looks correct. What was Maxwell's proposal on a date? Best Sigrid Sigrid McCawley Partner BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP www.bsfllp.com On May 7, 2021 at 6:47:17 PM EDT, Sigrid, •* > (USANYS) .ic > wrote: We are preparing our letter to the Court about the trial date, which is due on Monday. Based on our conversation, we believe the following is accurate but please let us know if you would like to discuss: is available to

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00102162
Pages
4
Persons
2
Integrity

Summary

From: ' To:' Cc: ' )" (USANYS)" < )" Subject: Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 02:38:21 -4)000 Makes sense, thanks. On May 9, 2021, at 10:12 PM, (USANYS) < > wrote: I can just refer her back to the defense letter on April 22, 2021 filed on the docket requesting a continuance to November 8, 2021 unless there is something else you have in mind. From: Sigrid McCawley c Sent: Saturday, May 8, 2021 7:35 AM To: (USANYS) < Cc: Subject: RE: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Hello -that looks correct. What was Maxwell's proposal on a date? Best Sigrid Sigrid McCawley Partner BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP www.bsfllp.com On May 7, 2021 at 6:47:17 PM EDT, Sigrid, •* > (USANYS) .ic > wrote: We are preparing our letter to the Court about the trial date, which is due on Monday. Based on our conversation, we believe the following is accurate but please let us know if you would like to discuss: is available to

Persons Referenced (2)

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: ' To: ' Cc: ' )" (USANYS)" < )" Subject: Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 02:38:21 -4)000 Makes sense, thanks. On May 9, 2021, at 10:12 PM, (USANYS) < > wrote: I can just refer her back to the defense letter on April 22, 2021 filed on the docket requesting a continuance to November 8, 2021 unless there is something else you have in mind. From: Sigrid McCawley c Sent: Saturday, May 8, 2021 7:35 AM To: (USANYS) < Cc: Subject: RE: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Hello -that looks correct. What was Maxwell's proposal on a date? Best Sigrid Sigrid McCawley Partner BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP www.bsfllp.com On May 7, 2021 at 6:47:17 PM EDT, Sigrid, •* > (USANYS) .ic > wrote: We are preparing our letter to the Court about the trial date, which is due on Monday. Based on our conversation, we believe the following is accurate but please let us know if you would like to discuss: is available to testify at a trial if it is scheduled to begin November 29, 2021. would likely be unavailable for trial between October 1, 2021 and Thanksgiving. Thanks, EFTA00102162 From: Sigrid McCawley Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 6:22 PM To: >; (USANYS) Cc: Subject: RE: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AIN) That works — I will dial in at 6:45. Sigrid McCawley Partner BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP www.bsfllp.com l< From: < Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 5:57 PM >; (USANYS) To: Sigrid McCawley < > Cc: < Subject: RE: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Hi Sigrid, Thanks so much for making the time to talk. We're free at 6:45 tonight, if that still works. We can use this conference line: Thanks, From: Sigrid McCawley Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 4:31 PM To: (USANYS) Cc: ) > Subject: RE: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Yes. I can talk anytime now until 5:30 and then from 6:00 - 7:15 if any of those times work? Tomorrow I am open from 9-10 or 12-2. Please let me know what works for you. Best, Sigrid Sigrid McCawley Partner BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP EFTA00102163 www.bsfllp.com From: (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 4:27 PM To: Sigrid McCawley Cc: Subject: RE: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Sigrid, Do you have a few minutes to speak tonight or tomorrow? Please let us know when works for you. Thanks, From: Sigrid McCawley Sent: Tuesday, May 4, 2021 9:18 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: Subject: RE: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Just as a follow up. I just heard back from and she said her strong preference is as early as possible in the fall — early September would be her preference. and her husband are going through the process of trying to adopt a baby and the birth mother is due in early November (and of course babies can sometimes come a bit earlier). The birth mother has not finalized the match so this is a fluid situation but wants to make sure she is able to be there when the baby is born and of course care for her newborn immediately following the birth. I will keep you updated but strong preference is for as early as possible. All my best, Sigrid Sigrid McCawley Partner BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP www.bsfllp.com From: (USANYS) [mailto: Sent: Monday, May 3, 2021 6:34 PM To: Sigrid McCawley Cr: EFTA00102164 Subject: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Sigrid, Please see the attached order regarding the trial date in this case. We will update you when we have more information. Thanks, Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York The information contacted in this electronic message is confidential information intended only for the use of the named recipieM(s) and may contain information that. among other protections. is the subject of attorney-client priviege. attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this electronic message is not the named recipient. or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the named recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination. distribution. copying or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and no prMlege is waived. If ycu have received this communication n error. please immediately notify the sender by replying to this electronic message and then detailg this electronic message from your computer. (v.1 08201831889 The information centaned in this electronic message is confidential information intended only for the use of the named recipieM(s) and may contain information that. among other protections. is the subject of attorney-client priviege. attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this electronic message is not the named recipient. or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the named recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination. distribution. copying or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and no prMlege is waived. If you have received this communication n error. please immediately notify the sender by replying to this electronic message and then deletng this electronic message from your cemputer. (v.1 08201831889 The information conned in this electronic message is confidential information intended only for the use of the named recipients) and may contain information that. among other protections. is the subject of attorney-client privilege. attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this electronic message is not the named recipient. or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the named recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination. distribution. copying or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and no privilege is waived. If you have received this communication n error. please immediately notify the sender by replying to this electronic message and then deletng this electronic message from your computer. (v.1 08201831889 The information contained in this electronic message is confidential information intended only for the use of the named recipient(s) and may coital, information that. among other protections. is the subject of attorney-client privilege. attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this electronic message is not the named recipient. or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the named recipient. you are hereby notified that any dssemination. distribution. copyng or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and no privilege is waned. If you have received this communication in error. Pease immediatety notify the sender by replying to this electronic message and then deleting this electronic message from your computer. (v.1 08201831839 EFTA00102165

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainwww.bsfllp.com

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 914 Filed 05/11/17 Page 1 of 1

1p
Court UnsealedDepositionNov 23, 2020

John Alessi deposition

Sigrid S. McCawley Telephone: (954) 356-0011 Email: smccawley@bsfllp.com November 20, 2020 VIA ECF The Honorable Loretta A. Preska District Court Judge United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 15-cv-7433-LAP Dear Judge Preska, Pursuant to the Court’s order dated November 20, 2020 (ECF No. 1157), and in light of Does 1 and 2 not submitting any objection to unsealing within 14 days of being served with their

17p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00027158

0p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

This court order authorizes attorneys Sigrid McCawley and David Boies to bring personal electronic d...

This court order authorizes attorneys Sigrid McCawley and David Boies to bring personal electronic devices and general purpose computing devices into the courthouse for use in the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The order specifies the devices allowed and courtrooms where they can be used. The attorneys are required to comply with the restrictions and obligations set forth in Standing Order M10-468, as Revised.

1p
Court UnsealedAug 9, 2019

Maxwell Disputes

Case 18-2868, Document 284, 08/09/2019, 2628244, Page1 of 38 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------X Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. -------------------------------------------------- ............................................. VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, 15-cv-07433-RWS Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiff’s Statement of Contested Facts and Plaintiff’s “Undisputed Facts” Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 56.1 Laura A. M

38p
Court UnsealedDepositionUnknown

Deposition Transcript: 533-2

The document is a deposition transcript of G Maxwell, where she is questioned about her involvement with Jeffrey Epstein, including her role in managing contact information and her knowledge of a specific document (Exhibit 13) allegedly stolen from Epstein's house.

18p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.