From: M,
From: M, (USANYS)" To: =Mr "Blase, Nicholas (USANYS)" Subject: RE: None of the charges are technically sex trafficking, correct? Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 14:30:16 +0000 As an FYI, and the team should correct me if I'm wrong, the sex trafficking statute with which Epstein was charged (18 UK 1591) was enacted in 2000—after the conduct alleged here. From: Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 10:28 AM To: Biase, Nicholas (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) < > Subject: RE: None of the charges are technically sex trafficking, correct? correct From: Biase, Nicholas (USANYS) Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2020 10:27 To: ) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: None of the charges are technically sex trafficking, correct? Nicholas Biase Public Affairs United States Department of Justice U.S. Attorney's Office I Southern District of New York EFTA00102321
Summary
From: M, (USANYS)" To: =Mr "Blase, Nicholas (USANYS)" Subject: RE: None of the charges are technically sex trafficking, correct? Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 14:30:16 +0000 As an FYI, and the team should correct me if I'm wrong, the sex trafficking statute with which Epstein was charged (18 UK 1591) was enacted in 2000—after the conduct alleged here. From: Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 10:28 AM To: Biase, Nicholas (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) < > Subject: RE: None of the charges are technically sex trafficking, correct? correct From: Biase, Nicholas (USANYS) Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2020 10:27 To: ) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: None of the charges are technically sex trafficking, correct? Nicholas Biase Public Affairs United States Department of Justice U.S. Attorney's Office I Southern District of New York EFTA00102321
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.