Subject: RE: Ghislaine Maxwell maximum sentence --a doubt
From: To: Subject: RE: Ghislaine Maxwell maximum sentence --a doubt Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2020 15:02:53 +0000 Inline-Images: hnage001.jpg Yes, and it's a good question! Credit to her for checking. The answer is that a defendant can't be subject to more punishment than whatever the penalty was at the time of the offense. So, normally we're prosecuting people who committed crimes recently, so whatever the current law is applies to them. Here, the maximum sentences for these offenses were different back in 1994-97, which is the time period of our charges, and the maximum sentences were less at that time than they are now. From Sent: Monday, July 06, 2020 11:00 To: Subject: Fwd: Ghislaine Maxwell maximum sentence --a doubt Would you happen to know? Thx Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: CAL < Date: July 6, 2020 at 10:53:55 AM EDT To: Subject: Ghislaine Maxwell maximum sentence --a doubt Hi a Sorry to bother but I saw on Maxwell detention memo that "the de
Summary
From: To: Subject: RE: Ghislaine Maxwell maximum sentence --a doubt Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2020 15:02:53 +0000 Inline-Images: hnage001.jpg Yes, and it's a good question! Credit to her for checking. The answer is that a defendant can't be subject to more punishment than whatever the penalty was at the time of the offense. So, normally we're prosecuting people who committed crimes recently, so whatever the current law is applies to them. Here, the maximum sentences for these offenses were different back in 1994-97, which is the time period of our charges, and the maximum sentences were less at that time than they are now. From Sent: Monday, July 06, 2020 11:00 To: Subject: Fwd: Ghislaine Maxwell maximum sentence --a doubt Would you happen to know? Thx Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: CAL < Date: July 6, 2020 at 10:53:55 AM EDT To: Subject: Ghislaine Maxwell maximum sentence --a doubt Hi a Sorry to bother but I saw on Maxwell detention memo that "the de
Persons Referenced (2)
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Related Documents (6)
EFTA01905212
EFTA01838551
reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that
reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, [REDACTED - Survivor], Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science
GRAND JURY [EFTA00008998]
GRAND JURY EXHIBIT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. S1 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Entice Minors to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts) The Grand Jury charges: OVERVIEW The char...
EFTA01682184
Epstein Reputation Management Email Reveals Paid SEO/Hacking Campaign to Suppress Negative Coverage
The email provides concrete details about a paid operation to manipulate search results for Jeffrey Epstein, including payments, specific tactics, and references to high‑profile associates. It suggest Epstein hired a contractor (Mike) for $2,500 plus a pending $7,500 to run SEO and hacking services. The operation involved removing negative articles, altering Wikipedia, replacing mug‑shot images, a
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.