(USANYS)"

From: (USANYS)" To: ' " " " Subject: FW: U.S. v. Maxwell, Case No. 20 Cr. 330 (AN) [Joint Letter re. Redactions to Omnibus Resp. 8z. Ex. II] Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2021 17:17:38 +0000 Attachments: 2021.04.01 Joint Letter_re_redaetions_in Govt_Response.pdf: 2021.03.09 LAM- Letter to Nathan re re-dactions in Govt Res on df _ _ _ p sc.p _ _ _ _ lane-Images: image001.jpg Team, Judge Nathan also ordered the parties to docket the April 1 joint letter yesterday at the same time she ordered us to file the brief and exhibits by 3 pm. If we think this letter needs redactions, we have to propose redactions by April 19. I don't think the joint letter needs redactions but please let me know if you disagree. I would draw your attention to page 5 of the joint letter, in which Menninger wrote: Indeed, this Court rejected Ms. Maxwell's argument that certain portions of the Response and its exhibits should be unredacted because the material had already been made public. See Dkt. No. 1