Case Fileefta-efta00103700DOJ Data Set 9Subject: RE: Tartaglione Redactions Question
Unknown1p
Subject: RE: Tartaglione Redactions Question
From: Subject: RE: Tartaglione Redactions Question Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 00:57:13 +0000 Attachments: Pages_from_Pages_l_-_506_(050221_720pm)tworking)t .pdf Hi My view is that we redact references to Epstein's memory of the incident and injuries from the incident be redacted because they tend to reveal details of the incident. I would also redact references to Epstein's safety concerns in the SHU after the incident because they tend to suggest that Epstein was implying he was attacked during the incident. I've redboxed my proposed redactions in the email you sent. Thanks, From: Sent: Sunday, May 2, 20218:50 PM To: Subject: Tartaglione Redactions Question and I think we have inconsistent Tartaglione redactions on the text in the attached. The text also appears in some medical records. Specifically, had the following note on page 2624: RIP - redact "but he said he thinks his memory for the incident (injury to his neck) may be impaired because of his sleep apnea" and "He
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.